This randomized clinical trial assesses whether etoposide plus cisplatin or irinotecan plus cisplatin is a more effective treatment regimen in terms of overall survival in patients with advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the digestive system.
4006 Background: BTCs have an aggressive tumor biology with limited treatment options. With a HER2-positivity rate of 5–20% in BTCs, case series and small clinical trials have shown signs of activity for HER2 blockade in these pts. T-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of a humanized monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor. The HERB trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-arm phase 2 trial of T-DXd in pts with HER2-expressing BTCs. Methods: Centrally confirmed HER2-expressing (HER2-positive: IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+, and HER2-low-expressing [HER2-low]: IHC/ISH status of 0/+, 1+/-, 1+/+, or 2+/-) pts with BTCs who were refractory or intolerant to gemcitabine containing regimen received 5.4 mg/kg of T-DXd every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in HER2-positive pts by independent central review. The sample size of 22 had 80% power with one-sided alpha error of 5%; threshold ORR, 15%; and expected ORR, 40%. The ORR, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) in HER2-positive/-low pts, and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed as secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 32 pts, 24 with HER2-positive and 8 with HER2-low BTCs, received T-DXd. Twenty-two pts with HER2-positive, excluding 2 ineligible pts, were identified for primary efficacy analysis. Among the 22 pts, IHC3+ and IHC2+/ISH+ were 45.5% and 54.5%, primary sites: gallbladder/extrahepatic/intrahepatic/Vater were 11/6/3/2, median number of prior regimens was 2 (range, 1–4). The confirmed ORR in HER2-positive pts was 36.4% (8/22; 2 CR and 6 PR; 90% CI, 19.6–56.1), indicating statistically significant improvement in ORR (P = 0.01). The DCR, median (m) PFS, mOS were 81.8% (95% CI, 59.7–94.8), 4.4 months (mo) (95% CI, 2.8–8.3), 7.1 mo (95% CI, 4.7–14.6), respectively. In addition, encouraging efficacy were seen even in HER2-low pts; ORR, DCR, mPFS, and mOS were 12.5% (1/8; 1 PR; 95% CI, 0.3–52.7), 75.0% (95% CI, 34.9–96.8), 4.2 mo (95% CI, 1.3–6.2), and 8.9 mo (95% CI, 3.0–12.8), respectively. In the safety analysis set (n = 32), TEAEs of > = grade (G) 3 occurred in 81.3% (26/32); the common TEAEs were anemia (53.1%), neutropenia (31.3%), and leukopenia (31.3%). TEAEs leading to drug discontinuation occurred in 8 pts (25.0%). Eight pts (25.0%) had interstitial lung disease (ILD; G1/G2/G3/G5 were 3/1/2/2) not adjudicated by an independent committee. Conclusions: T-DXd showed promising activity in pts with HER2-expressing BTCs. Although the safety profile was generally consistent with other T-DXd studies, ILD, an important identified risk of T-DXd, requires more careful monitoring and intervention. These results support further exploration of T-DXd in this patient population. Clinical trial information: JMA-IIA00423.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether improvement in outcomes from antenatal corticosteroid treatment in extremely and very preterm twins is similar to that observed in singletons, and to investigate whether antenatal corticosteroid treatment has different effects according to chorionicity or birth order. METHODS: This population-based study was based on an analysis of data collected by the Neonatal Research Network of Japan from 2003 to 2015 of neonates weighing 1,500 g or less at birth, from gestational ages of 24 0/7 to 31 6/7 weeks of gestation. After propensity score matching, univariate logistic and interaction analyses were performed to compare short-term (neonatal period) and medium-term (3 years of age) outcomes of the children of mothers who received antenatal corticosteroids with those of children of mothers who did not receive antenatal corticosteroids. We focused on differences between singletons and twins, between monochorionic and dichorionic twins and between the first and second twin. RESULTS: The study comprised 23,502 singletons and 6,546 twins. Antenatal corticosteroid treatment was associated with significant decreased short-term neurologic outcomes in both singletons and twins. However, antenatal corticosteroid treatment was associated with significantly decreased mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.61; 95% CI 0.53–0.70), respiratory distress syndrome (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.67–0.76), and cerebral palsy (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.72–0.99) in singletons but not in twins (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.68–1.17; OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87–1.12; and OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61–1.11, respectively). No association was found between chorionicity and the efficacy of antenatal corticosteroid treatment on outcomes. Further, no association was found between birth order and the efficacy of antenatal corticosteroid treatment on outcomes, except for periventricular leukomalacia and necrotizing enterocolitis (interaction: P=.02 and P=.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: Antenatal corticosteroid treatment in twins was associated with a beneficial effect on short-term neurologic outcomes only, without improvement in other short-term and medium-term outcomes. There was no difference related to chorionicity.
To estimate whether antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) improve short- and long-term preterm offspring outcomes in singleton pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) similar to pregnancies without HDP. This population-based retrospective study was conducted based on an analysis of data collected by the Neonatal Research Network of Japan on 21,014 singleton neonates weighing ≤1,500 g between 24 and 31 weeks’ gestation during 2003–2016. Logistic regression analyses were performed to compare short- and long-term offspring outcomes between mothers receiving ACS treatment and those who did not among pregnancies with HDP and without HDP. Of 21,014 neonates, 4,806 (22.9%) were born to mothers with HDP. ACS treatment was associated with significant decreases in short-term adverse outcomes in the both HDP and non-HDP groups, with similar reduced odds of neonatal death, respiratory distress syndrome, and intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH). However, ACS treatment did not significantly decrease severe IVH (aOR 0.76; 95% CI 0.51–1.13) and periventricular leukomalacia (1.14; 0.78–1.66) in the HDP group. In addition, ACS treatment in mothers without HDP significantly decreased cerebral palsy (aOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.58–084), developmental quotient scores <85 (0.79; 0.69–0.90), and composite adverse outcomes (0.85; 0.75–0.96) at 3 years of age, whereas ACS treatment in mothers with HDP did not significantly improve these outcomes (1.04; 0.69–1.57, 1.11; 0.88–1.39, 0.96; 0.75–1.22, respectively). ACS treatment was associated with significantly decreased major short-term morbidities and mortality among extremely and very preterm neonates of mothers with HDP, with ACS treatment having a decreased effect compared to that observed in neonates of mothers without HDP. Although ACS treatment has no additional effects on offspring outcomes at 3 years of age, our results did not suggest that ACS treatment should be withheld from mothers with HDP.
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) is an antibody–drug conjugate composed of a humanized monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker and a potent topoisomerase I inhibitor. The drug’s efficacy has been proven in HER2-positive breast and gastric cancers. The rate of HER2 positivity in biliary tract cancer (BTC) has been reported to be 5–20%, and case reports and clinical trials have suggested that HER2 inhibitors might be active in HER2-positive BTC. Here we describe the rationale and design of the phase II HERB trial that will evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-expressing unresectable or recurrent BTC. The primary end point will be the centrally assessed objective response rate in HER2-positive patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.