Volvox rousseletii is a dioecious species belonging to Volvox sect. Volvox that has previously only been found in Africa. During field surveys in a large dam lake (Lake Sagami) in Kanagawa Prefecture, central Japan, we encountered a Volvox sect. Volvox species that produces dioecious sexual spheroids in the water column. Although sexual induction of this species in culture did not produce adequately well-developed sexual spheroids for species identification, molecular data directly obtained from field-collected sexual spheroids verified the identity of field-collected male and female sexual spheroids as well as cultured materials. Based on molecular and morphological data, the species was identified as V . rousseletii . This is the first record of a dioecious species of Volvox sect. Volvox in Japan.

Background: Morphological novelties have been acquired through evolutionary processes and related to the adaptation of new life-history strategies with new functions of the bodyparts. Cephalopod molluscs such as octopuses, squids and cuttlefishes possess unique morphological characteristics. Among those novel morphologies, in particular, suckers arranged along the oral side of each arm possess multiple functions, such as capturing prey and locomotion, so that the sucker morphology is diversified among species, depending on their ecological niche. However, the detailed developmental process of sucker formation has remained unclear, although it is known that new suckers are formed or added during both embryonic and postembryonic development. In the present study, therefore, focusing on two cuttlefish species, Sepia esculenta and S. lycidas, in which the sucker morphology is relatively simple, morphological and histological observations were carried out during embryonic and postembryonic development to elucidate the developmental process of sucker formation and to compare them among other cephalopod species. Results: The observations in both species clearly showed that the newly formed suckers were added on the oral side of the most distal tip of each arm during embryonic and postembryonic development. On the oral side of the arm tip, the epithelial tissue became swollen to form a ridge along the proximal-distal axis (sucker field ridge). Next to the sucker field ridge, there were small dome-shaped bulges that are presumed to be the sucker buds. Toward the proximal direction, the buds became functional suckers, in which the inner tissues differentiated to form the complex sucker structures. During postembryonic development, on both sides of the sucker field ridge, epithelial tissues extended to form a sheath, covering the ridge for protection of undifferentiated suckers. Conclusions: The developmental process of sucker formation, in which sucker buds are generated from a ridge structure (sucker field ridge) on the oral side at the distal-most arm tip, was shared in both cuttlefish species, although some minor heterochronic shifts of the developmental events were detected between the two species.

No abstract

Cephalopods have acquired numerous novelties and expanded their habitats to various marine environments as highly agile predators. Among cephalopod novelties, multiple arms are used for complex behaviors, including prey capture. Suckers on arms are innovative features for realizing these arm functions. In addition, tentacles in Decapodiformes (squids and cuttlefishes) are arms specialized in prey capture and tentacular suckers show unique morphologies. However, little is known about the developmental process of sucker formation that should differ between tentacles and other arms. In this study, therefore, sucker formation processes on second arms and tentacles were observed and compared in a bigfin reef squid, Sepioteuthis lessoniana, to reveal the developmental processes forming the unique sucker morphologies, especially in tentacles. Morphological and histological observations of suckers during embryogenesis showed that, in second arms, the sucker‐producing area appeared at the most distal part. At the most proximal side of the sucker‐producing area, new sucker buds were isolated by invagination of the epithelial tissue. At the proximal arm parts, suckers with functional structures were observed. In tentacles, although the basic sucker formation pattern was similar to that in second arms, sucker formation started at earlier embryonic stages and the number of suckers was drastically increased compared to that in second arms. In addition, although four sucker rows were observed at the tentacular club, that is, the thickest part of a tentacle, our observations suggested that two sets of two sucker rows are compressed to form the four rows. Therefore, the sucker‐formation processes are temporally and spatially different between arms and tentacles. In addition, S. lessoniana shows conserved and unique patterns of sucker formation in comparison with previously described species, suggesting that sucker formation patterns were diversified among Decapodiformes lineages.

Background : Morphological novelties have been acquired through evolutionary processes in relation to the acquisition of new life-history strategies together with novel functions of bodyparts. Cephalopod molluscs such as octopuses, squids and cuttlefishes possess novel morphological characteristics such as their overall bodyplans and numerous arms. Among those novel morphologies, in particular, suckers arranged along the oral side of each arm possess multiple functions, such as capturing prey and locomotion, so that the sucker morphology is diversified among species, depending on their ecological niche. However, the detailed developmental process of sucker formation has remained unclear, although it is known that new suckers are formed or added throughout their life-time, including during both embryonic and postembryonic development. In the present study, therefore, focusing on two cuttlefish species, Sepia esculenta and S. lycidas ,in which the sucker morphology is relatively simple, morphological and histological observations were carried out during embryonic and postembryonic development to elucidate the developmental process of sucker formation. Results : The observations in both species clearly showed that the newly formed suckers were added on the oral side of the most distal tip of each arm during embryonic and postembryonic development. On the oral side of the arm tip, the epithelial tissue became swollen to form a ridge along the proximal-distal axis (distal sucker ridge). Next to the distal ridge, there were small dome-shaped bulges that are presumed to be the sucker primordia. Toward the proximal direction, the primordia became functional suckers, in which the inner tissues differentiated to form the complex sucker structures. During postembryonic development, on both sides of the distal sucker ridge, epithelial tissues extended to form a sheath, covering the ridge for protection of undifferentiated suckers. Conclusions : The developmental process of sucker formation, in which sucker primordia are generated from a ridge structure (distal sucker ridge) on the oral side at the distal-most arm tip, was shared in both cuttlefish species.