Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) of proteins and nucleic acids to form membraneless cellular compartments is considered to be involved in various biological functions. The RNA-binding protein fused in sarcoma (FUS) undergoes LLPS in vivo and in vitro. Here, we investigated the effects of pressure and temperature on the LLPS of FUS by high-pressure microscopy and high-pressure UV/vis spectroscopy. The phase-separated condensate of FUS was obliterated with increasing pressure but was observed again at a higher pressure. We generated a pressure–temperature phase diagram that describes the phase separation of FUS and provides a general understanding of the thermodynamic properties of self-assembly and phase separation of proteins. FUS has two types of condensed phases, observed at low pressure (LP-LLPS) and high pressure (HP-LLPS). The HP-LLPS state was more condensed and exhibited lower susceptibility to dissolution by 1,6-hexanediol and karyopherin-β2 than the LP-LLPS state. Moreover, molecular dynamic simulations revealed that electrostatic interactions were destabilized, whereas cation−π, π–π, and hydrophobic interactions were stabilized in HP-LLPS. When cation−π, π–π, and hydrophobic interactions were transiently stabilized in the cellular environment, the phase transition to HP-LLPS occurred; this might be correlated to the aberrant enrichment of cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein granules, leading to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

The RNA-binding protein fused in sarcoma (FUS) undergoes liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) both in vivo and in vitro. Self-assembled liquid droplets of FUS transform into reversible hydrogels and into more irreversible and toxic aggregates. Although LLPS can be a precursor of irreversible aggregates, a generic method to study kinetics of the formation of LLPS has not been developed. Here, we demonstrated the pressure-jump kinetics of phase transition between the 1-phase state and FUS-LLPS states observed at low pressure (<2 kbar, LP-LLPS) and high pressure (>2 kbar, HP-LLPS) using high-pressure UV/vis spectroscopy. Absorbance (turbidity) changes were reproduced repeatedly using pressure cycles. The Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov theory was used to understand droplet formation occurring via nucleation and growth. The Avrami exponent n, representing the dimensionality of growing droplets, and the reaction rate constant k were calculated. The HP-LLPS formation rate was ∼2-fold slower than that of LP-LLPS. The Avrami exponent obtained for both LLPS states could be explained by diffusion-limited growth. Nucleation and growth rates decreased during LP-LLPS formation (n = 0.51), and the nucleation rate decreased with a constant growth rate in HP-LLPS formation (n = 1.4). The HP-LLPS vanishing rate was ∼20-fold slower than that of LP-LLPS. This difference in vanishing rates indicates a stronger intermolecular interaction in HP-LLPS than in LP-LLPS, which might promote transformation into irreversible aggregates in the droplets. Further, direct transition from HP-LLPS to LP-LLPS was observed. This indicates that interconversion between LP-LLPS and HP-LLPS occurs in equilibrium. Formation of reversible liquid droplets, followed by phase transition into another liquid phase, could thus be part of the physiological maturation process of FUS-LLPS.