Synthesis of 2-imidazolidinone (EU) from ethylenediamine carbamate (EDA-CA), which was produced via chemical absorption of CO2 in ethylenediamine (EDA), with a fixed-bed flow reactor was performed using CeO2 and EDA as a heterogeneous catalyst and reaction solvent, respectively. In the previously reported batch system for the same reaction, the yield of EU was low (62%) due to its sequential reaction with EDA into N,N′-bis(2-aminoethyl)urea (LU) with 38% yield in the liquid phase under the optimized reaction conditions at 413 K. In stark contrast, the flow reaction enabled the highly selective and high-yielding production of EU (94% yield) under the optimized reaction conditions at 363 K. This difference in the selectivity of EU originated from the lower ratio of the amount of EDA to that of the CeO2 catalyst in the current flow reaction system compared to the previous batch system. The highly crystallized CeO2 surface bearing both acid and base sites was found to be responsible for its high catalytic performance. The combination of the kinetics, density functional theory calculations, and adsorption experiments demonstrated that EDA-CA is preferentially adsorbed onto the surface of CeO2 even in the presence of an excess amount of EDA, which is used as a solvent, to be activated and transformed into EU. The solid-state 13C magic angle spinning/cross polarization nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy revealed that the CeO2 catalyst was deactivated gradually in a long-term reaction operation due to the formation and deposition of polyurea-like organic compounds on the catalyst surface.

No abstract

CeO 2 acted as an effective and reusable heterogeneous catalyst for the direct synthesis of 2-imidazolidinone from ethylenediamine carbamate (EDA-CA) without further addition of CO 2 in the reaction system. 2-Propanol was the best solvent among the solvents tested from the viewpoint of selectivity to 2-imidazolidinone, and the use of an adequate amount of 2-propanol provided high conversion and selectivity for the reaction. This positive effect of 2-propanol on the catalytic reaction can be explained by the solubility of EDA-CA in 2-propanol under the reaction conditions and no formation of solvent-derived byproducts. This catalytic system using the combination of the CeO 2 catalyst and the 2-propanol solvent provided 2-imidazolidinone in up to 83% yield on the EDA-CA basis at 413 K under Ar. The reaction conducted under Ar showed a higher reaction rate than that with pressured CO 2 , which clearly demonstrated the advantage of the catalytic system operated at low CO 2 pressure or even without CO 2 .