Background/Aim: The present study aimed to examine the influence of antibiotics (AB) on the clinical outcomes of Japanese patients treated with immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. Patients and Methods: A total of 31 patients with metastatic RCC treated with ICIs from November 2016 to April 2019 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Results: Five patients were treated with AB prior to ICIs treatment. Median progression free survival (PFS) of patients treated with AB vs. patients not treated with AB was 2.8 months and 18.4 months, respectively. The difference between PFS was statistically significant (p=0.0004). In multivariate analyses, AB use (p=0.0377) and presence of immune related adverse events (p=0.0042) were independent prognostic factors for PFS in association with ICIs therapy. Conclusion: The use of AB before ICIs treatment was a predictor of poor ICIs response in metastatic RCC.Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that target programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) protein, programmed cell death-ligand 1 protein, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), have changed the therapeutic landscape and are currently standard treatment options in patients with advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (1, 2). Despite the remarkable success of clinical applications, the efficacy of ICIs in RCC varies greatly across individual patients. Some researchers have reported biomarkers for predicting prognosis in patients treated with ICIs, such as PD-L1 and PD-L2 positivity, tumor mutation burden, and profile of immune-related genes (3). Furthermore, the association of immune related adverse events (irAEs) with prognosis in metastatic RCC has been recently reported (4, 5). Thus, it is critical to explore reliable predictors to improve prognosis of RCC patients treated with ICIs.Recently, several studies have demonstrated the crucial impact of human gut microbiota on ICIs therapies (6-9). It is well recognized that antibiotics (AB) alter the diversity and composition of gut microbiota and consequently shift their metabolic capacity (10). The hypothesis was that modulation of gut microbiota by AB may be associated with poor response to ICIs. However, the data on the association between AB use and clinical outcomes with ICIs are limited, especially in Japanese patients with genitourinary cancer.In the present study, we performed a retrospective analysis to examine the influence of AB on the clinical outcomes of Japanese patients treated with ICIs therapy for metastatic RCC patients. Patients and MethodsStudy design and patients. We retrospectively examined clinical information collected from 31 RCC patients treated with ICIs at Kurume University Hospital from November 2016 to April 2019. All patients received nivolumab or the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab. Nivolumab was intravenously administered at 3 mg/kg or 240 mg/body every 2 weeks. Nivolumab and ipilimumab were administered intravenously at a dose of 240 mg/body and 1 mg/kg, respectiv...
Introduction We describe a rare case of brachytherapy for prostate cancer in which a seed was lost from the perineum after a hydrogel injection. Case presentation A 71‐year‐old Japanese man was diagnosed with localized high‐risk prostate cancer. Trimodality therapy with I‐125 brachytherapy was selected, and combined androgen blockade therapy was initiated. Brachytherapy and hydrogel injection were performed 7 months after combined androgen blockade initiation; 6 months later, the patient visited our hospital with complaints of redness and bleeding in the perineum. Serous effusion and loss of a seed on the right side of the perineal anus were observed. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging showed a tunnel like discharge of hydrogel from the dorsal prostate to the perineum. The fistula was incised, the seed was removed, and drainage was performed. Conclusion Appropriate diagnosis and treatment with careful follow‐up are required in patients at high risk of infection after brachytherapy with hydrogel injection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.