Objective Interstitial lung disease (ILD) accompanied by anti–melanoma differentiation–associated gene 5 (anti–MDA‐5)–positive dermatomyositis (DM) is often rapidly progressive and associated with poor prognosis. Because there is no established treatment, we undertook this study to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combined immunosuppressive regimen for anti–MDA‐5–positive DM patients with ILD. Methods Adult Japanese patients with new‐onset anti–MDA‐5–positive DM with ILD (n = 29) were enrolled at multiple study centers from 2014 to 2017. They were treated with a regimen of high‐dose glucocorticoids (GCs), tacrolimus, and intravenous cyclophosphamide (IV CYC). Plasmapheresis was used if a patient's condition worsened after the regimen started. The primary end point was 6‐month survival, which was compared between this group of patients and a historical control group (n = 15) consisting of anti–MDA‐5–positive DM patients with ILD who received step‐up treatment (high‐dose GC and stepwise addition of immunosuppressant). Secondary end points were 12‐month survival rate, adverse events, and changes in laboratory data. Results The combined immunosuppressive regimen group showed significantly higher 6‐month survival rates than the step‐up treatment group (89% versus 33%; P < 0.0001). Over a period of 52 weeks, improvements in anti–MDA‐5 titers, serum ferritin levels, vital capacity, and chest high‐resolution computed tomography scores were observed. The combined immunosuppressive regimen group received IV CYC nearly 20 days earlier with shorter intervals and tended to receive plasmapheresis more often than patients undergoing step‐up treatment. Cytomegalovirus reactivation was frequently observed over 52 weeks. Conclusion A combined immunosuppressive regimen is effective for anti–MDA‐5–positive DM patients with ILD. Plasmapheresis can be used for additional effect in intractable disease. Patients should be carefully monitored for opportunistic infections during treatment.

No abstract

practice, DOAC have prevailed all over the world. After the release of DOAC, several national guidelines for the management of AF were updated, and now recommend DOAC as broadly preferable to VKA in the vast majority of patients with non-valvular AF. 6 RCT, however, are conducted under idealized and rigorously controlled conditions. Thus, RCT patients are highly selected, and hence are not broadly representative of real-world patients. Also, not many studies have investigated the real-world effectiveness and safety of DOAC in unselected patients; and, according to studies involving general practice settings, the outcomes of DOAC in real-world clinical practice do not necessarily coincide with the RCT outcomes. 7, 8 The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the change in OAC status over time and the clinical outcomes O ral anticoagulants (OAC) are essential for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The use of conventional OAC, such as a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), reduces stroke by 64%, compared with non-VKA users. 1 Until recently, VKA were the only available OAC but direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC; dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) have been introduced for stroke prevention in patients with AF. Recent large-scale randomized clinical trials (RCT) demonstrated the similar efficacy and safety of DOAC, compared with VKA.

There is a consensus that portal venous pressure (PVP) modulation prevents portal hypertension (PHT) and consequent complications after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT). However, PVP-modulation strategies need to be updated based on the most recent findings. We examined our 10-year experience of PVP modulation and reevaluated whether it was necessary for all recipients or for selected recipients in ALDLT. In this retrospective study, 319 patients who underwent ALDLT from 2007 to 2016 were divided into 3 groups according to the necessity and results of PVP modulation: not indicated (n = 189), indicated and succeeded (n = 92), and indicated but failed (n = 38). Graft survival and associations with various clinical factors were investigated. PVP modulation was performed mainly by splenectomy to lower final PVP to ≤15 mm Hg. Successful PVP modulation improved prognosis to be equivalent to that of patients who did not need modulation, whereas failed modulation was associated with increased incidence of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS; P = 0.003) and early graft loss (EGL; P = 0.006). Among patients with failed modulation, donor age ≥ 45 years (hazard ratio [HR], 3.67; P = 0.02) and ABO incompatibility (HR, 3.90; P = 0.01) were independent risk factors for graft loss. Survival analysis showed that PVP > 15 mm Hg was related to poor prognosis in grafts from either ABO-incompatible or older donor age ≥ 45 years (P < 0.001), but it did not negatively affect grafts from ABO-compatible/identical and young donor age < 45 years (P = 0.27). In conclusion, intentional PVP modulation is not necessarily required in all recipients. Although grafts from both ABO-compatible/identical and young donors can tolerate PHT, lowering PVP to ≤15 mm Hg is a key to preventing SFSS and consequent EGL with grafts from either ABO-incompatible or older donors.

No abstract