Drosophila is an excellent model organism for studying human neurodegenerative diseases (NDs). However, there is still almost no experimental system which could directly observe the degeneration of neurons and automatically quantify axonal degeneration. In this study, we created MeDUsA (a ‘method for the quantification of degeneration using fly axons’), a standalone executable computer program based on Python that combines a pre-trained deep-learning masking tool with an axon terminal counting tool. This software automatically quantifies the number of retinal R7 axons in Drosophila from a confocal z-stack image series. Using this software, we were able to directly demonstrate that axons were degenerated by the representative causative genes of NDs for the first time in Drosophila. The fly retinal axon is an excellent experimental system that is capable of mimicking the pathology of axonal degeneration in human NDs. MeDUsA rapidly and accurately quantifies axons in Drosophila photoreceptor neurons. It enables large-scale research into axonal degeneration, including screening to identify genes or drugs that mediate axonal toxicity caused by ND proteins and diagnose the pathological significance of novel variants of human genes in axons.

The Drosophila behavior/human splicing protein family is involved in numerous steps of gene regulation. In humans, this family consists of three proteins: SFPQ, PSPC1, and NONO. Hemizygous loss-of-function (LoF) variants in NONO cause a developmental delay with several complications (e.g., distinctive facial features, cardiac symptoms, and skeletal symptoms) in an X-linked recessive manner. Most of the reported variants have been LoF variants, and two missense variants have been reported as likely deleterious but with no functional validation. We report three individuals from two families harboring an identical missense variant that is located in the nuclear localization signal, NONO: NM_001145408.2:c.1375C > G p.(Pro459Ala). All of them were male and the variant was inherited from their asymptomatic mothers. Individual 1 was diagnosed with developmental delay and cardiac phenotypes (ventricular tachycardia and dilated cardiomyopathy), which overlapped with the features of reported individuals having NONO LoF variants. Individuals 2 and 3 were monozygotic twins. Unlike in Individual 1, developmental delay with autistic features was the only symptom found in them. A fly experiment and cell localization experiment showed that the NONO variant impaired its proper intranuclear localization, leading to mild LoF. Our findings suggest that deleterious NONO missense variants should be taken into consideration when whole-exome sequencing is performed on male individuals with developmental delay with or without cardiac symptoms.

No abstract

Autosomal dominant optic atrophy (DOA) is a progressive form of blindness caused by degeneration of retinal ganglion cells and their axons, mainly caused by mutations in the OPA1 mitochondrial dynamin like GTPase (OPA1) gene. OPA1 encodes a dynamin-like GTPase present in the mitochondrial inner membrane. When associated with OPA1 mutations, DOA can present not only ocular symptoms but also multi-organ symptoms (DOA plus). DOA plus often results from point mutations in the GTPase domain, which are assumed to have dominant negative effects. However, the presence of mutations in the GTPase domain does not always result in DOA plus. Therefore, an experimental system to distinguish between DOA and DOA plus is needed. In this study, we found that loss-of-function mutations of the dOPA1 gene in Drosophila can imitate the pathology of optic nerve degeneration observed in DOA. We successfully rescued this degeneration by expressing the human OPA1 (hOPA1) gene, indicating that hOPA1 is functionally interchangeable with dOPA1 in the fly system. However, we could not rescue any previously reported mutations known to cause either DOA or DOA plus. By expressing both WT and DOA plus mutant hOPA1 forms in the optic nerve of dOPA1 mutants, we observed that DOA plus mutations suppressed the rescue, facilitating the distinction between loss-of-function and dominant negative mutations in hOPA1. The fly model developed in this study can assist in the differential diagnosis between DOA and DOA plus and inform early treatment decisions in patients with mutations in hOPA1.

No abstract