Colles' fracture has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of hip fracture. The incidence of low bone mineral density (BMD) and high bone turnover in such patients is uncertain. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess BMD and bone turnover in a cohort of consecutive postmenopausal Colles' fracture patients. BMD (spine, hip and contralateral radius) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within 2 weeks of fracture. Bone turnover was assessed within 4 days by measurement of serum osteocalcin, total alkaline phosphatase (TALP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) and urine hydroxyproline. We recruited 106 (71%) of 149 consecutive patients. Fifty-one per cent of subjects had a history of previous fracture, and 25% a past history of wrist, hip or vertebral body fracture. The incidence of osteoporosis was 21%, 42% and 22% at the spine, hip and radius respectively. Fifty per cent of subjects had osteoporosis of at least one of these sites. When compared with the values expected for their age the patients were found to have higher BMD than expected at the spine, and slightly lower BMD at the hip and distal radius. Patients aged 65 years or less had lower hip BMD than expected from the age-matched normal range (p < 0.01). Osteocalcin and TALP levels did not differ from the normal ranges, but BSAP and hydroxyproline levels were significantly elevated (p < 0.001), with 37% and 25% of patients having levels above the respective normal ranges. We conclude that osteoporosis is common in patients with Colles' fracture; however, in older patients BMD is not lower than would be expected in the normal population. In patients aged 65 years or less BMD is lower than expected at the hip. Bone turnover rate is high in many such patients. Intervention to prevent future fracture would be appropriate in women aged 65 years or less with Colles' fracture.

No abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has been proposed as a tool which can measure both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of bone tissue and can predict the future risk of osteoporotic fractures. However, the usefulness of QUS in long-term monitoring has yet to be defined. We studied a group of early postmenopausal women over a 4-year period. Thirty subjects were allocated to hormone replacement therapy and 30 selected as controls matched for age, years past the menopause (YPM) and bone mineral density (BMD) at the anteroposterior spine (AP spine). The mean age of the subjects was 52.4 years (SD 3.9 years), mean YPM 4.0 years (SD 3.2) and all subjects had a BMD T-score above -2.5 SD (number of standard units related to the young normal mean population). BMD was measured at baseline and annually by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the AP spine and total hip, and QUS carried out at the calcaneus, measuring broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS) and Stiffness. Mean percentage changes from baseline were assessed at 2 and 4 years. The overall treatment effect (defined as the difference in percentage change between the two groups) was: AP spine BMD, 11.4%; total hip BMD, 7.4%; BUA, 6.4%; SOS, 1.1%; and Stiffness, 10.4% (p<0.01). To compare the long-term precision of the two techniques we calculated the Standardized Precision, which for QUS was approximately 2-3 times that of DXA, for a given rate of change. The ability of each site to monitor response to treatment was assessed by calculating the Treatment Response Index (Treatment Effect/Standardized Precision), which was: AP spine BMD, 10.4; total hip BMD, 3.9; BUA, 3.1; SOS, 0.3; and Stiffness, 4.2. This was then normalized for AP spine BMD (to compare the role of QUS against the current standard, AP Spine BMD), which was: total hip BMD, 0.38; BUA, 0.30; Stiffness, 0.40 (p<0.01); and SOS, 0.03 (NS). In summary, QUS parameters in the early menopause showed a similar rate of decline as AP spine BMD and total hip BMD measured by DXA. Hormone replacement therapy results in bone gain at the AP spine and total hip, and prevents loss in BUA and SOS measured by QUS at the calcaneus. QUS has a potential role in long-term monitoring, although presently the time period to follow individual subjects remains 2-3 times that for DXA, for a given rate of change. Anteroposterior spine remains the current optimal DXA monitoring site due to its greater rate of change and better long-term precision.

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to use a novel method of data analysis to demonstrate that patients with osteoporosis have significantly lower ultrasound results in the heel after correcting for the effect of bone mineral density (BMD) measured in the spine or hip. Three groups of patients were studied: healthy early postmenopausal women, within 3 years of the menopause (n = 104, 50%), healthy late postmenopausal women, more than 10 years from the menopause (n = 75, 36%), and a group of women with osteoporosis as defined by WHO criteria (n = 30, 14%). Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS) and Stiffness wer measured using a Lunar Achilles heel machine, and BMD of the lumbar spine and left hip was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). SOS, BUA and Stiffness were regressed against lumbar spine BMD and femoral BMD for all three groups combined. The correlation coefficients were in the range 0.52-0.58, in agreement with previously published work. Using a calculated ratio R, analysis of variance demonstrated that the ratio was significantly higher in the osteoporotic group compared with the other two groups. This implied that heel ultrasound values are proportionately lower in the osteoporotic group compared with the other two groups for an equivalent value of lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD. We conclude that postmenopausal bone loss is not associated with different ultrasound values once lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD is taken into account. Ultrasound does not give additional information about patterns of bone loss is postmenopausal patients but is important in those patients with osteoporosis and fractures.

Large, multicentre clinical trials using DXA to monitor bone density following intervention are now common. At the same time, several different bone densitometers and calibration phantoms are currently in use. The aim of this study was to document the technical information required on cross-calibration of equipment, reproducibility and patient dose before commencing a multicentre clinical trial. To this end, we obtained an in vitro and in vivo cross-calibration of two machines (a Hologic QDR 2000 and a Lunar DPX-L) that were not significantly different. Interobserver and intraobserver precision, and radiation dose were also measured and three commonly used phantoms assessed for their usefulness in cross-calibration and quality assurance. Measured in vitro precision on the two machines (0.3-0.7%) was better than that specified by the manufacturers. In vivo precision was worse (1.4-2.1%), as might be expected in patients with reduced bone mass. Mean entrance skin radiation doses on each machine were 280 microSv for the QDR 2000 and 38 microSv for the DPX-L. No one phantom is ideal, but the European Spine Phantom or Lunar Aluminium Spine Phantom will provide an adequate cross-calibration for a clinical trial. This study demonstrates that an adequate cross-calibration can be obtained for use in groups of patients and that the equipment used is reproducible with a low radiation output.