SUMMARYThe use of iterative dynamic programming employing systematic region contraction and accessible grid points is investigated for the optimal control of time-delay systems. At the time of generating the grid points for the state variables, the corresponding delayed variables at each time stage are also generated and stored in memory. Then, when applying dynamic programming, a linear approximation is used to obtain the initial profile for the delayed variables during integration. This procedure was tested with four problems of different complexity. In each case the optimal control policy is easily obtained and the results compare very favourably with those reported in the literature using other computational procedures.
SUMMARYThis paper presents the use of iterative dynamic programming employing exact penalty functions for minimum energy control problems. We show that exact continuously non‐differentiable penalty functions are superior to continuously differentiable penalty functions in terms of satisfying final state constraints. We also demonstrate that the choice of an appropriate penalty function factor depends on the relative size of the time delay with respect to the final time and on the expected value of the energy consumption. A quadratic approximation (QA) of the delayed variables is much better than a linear approximation (LA) of the same for relatively large time delays. The QA improves the rate of convergence and avoids the formation of ‘kinks‘.A more general way of selecting appropriate penalty function factors is given and the results obtained using four illustrative examples of varying complexity corroborate the efficacy of the method.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.