The following material is discussed in this paper: Incidence Coalgebras for PO sets; Reduced Boolean Coalgebras; Divided Powers Coalgebra; Dirichlet Coalgebra; Eulerian Coalgebra; Faà di Bruno Bialgebra; Incidence Coalgebras for Categories; The Umbral Calculus; Infinitesimal Coalgebras; Creation and Annihilation Operators; Point Lattice Coalgebras; Restricted Placements; Cleavages; and Hereditary Bialgebras.
In this article, we present an approach to critiquing and correcting novice programs that “work” (that is, they have correct I/O behavior for all input from the problem space), but are poorly constructed. Poorly constructed working code is often produced by beginning programming students, and it is important but difficult to teach them why some working code is better than others. Traditional explanations of these problems often rest on some kind of efficiency principle. We shall argue that using efficiency as a guiding principle in critiquing working code is inappropriate for novice programmers. Instead, we develop an approach to critiquing working but poorly constructed novice programs based on the principle of program readability. That is, we base our critique of working code on its ability to communicate to program readers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.