The organism was observed both within and outside of neutrophils. It grew in chains, especially in tissue, but also appeared as single cells in secretions. Ducrey consistently observed this organism from a cleansed soft chancre, in pus from an unruptured bubo, and in the deep portion of an abscess. Since he was unable to culture the organism in vitro, he used serial cutaneous inoculations to establish the specificity of the infectious agent. His observations were confirmed by Krefting in 1892 and also by Unna in 1892 (as cited in reference 160). There is some controversy concerning the first culture isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi. Sullivan (160) attributed the first cultures of the bacillus of Ducrey to Lenglet in 1898 and Bezancon, Griffin, and LeSourd in 1900. However, Istamanoff (131) and Akspianz (38) have been credited with earlier isolations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.