We studied the effect of entacapone, a selective catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor, on the bioavailability and clinical effect of levodopa in Parkinson's disease (PD). On day 1 (control day), nine patients received their own levodopa (plus benserazide) medication only; for the next 7 days they received 200 mg of entacapone with each dose of levodopa (tid or qid). We evaluated disability in the morning (8 AM) before drug administration and then at 1-hour intervals until 6 PM on days 1, 2, and 8, using a modified motor part of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Repeated blood samples were taken before and during the 4 hours after the morning drugs for pharmacokinetic evaluation of entacapone and of levodopa and its metabolites. Added to the levodopa treatment, entacapone decreased clinical disability by about 16% (p < 0.05) from day 1 to day 8. The area under the curve (AUC) of levodopa increased by 38% (p < 0.01) after administration of a single dose of entacapone and by 40% (p < 0.05) after 7 days of multiple dosing with entacapone. Entacapone did not change the Tmax and Cmax values of levodopa. After 7 days of treatment with entacapone, the AUC of 3-O-methyldopa had decreased by 44% (p < 0.01) and of homovanillic acid by 26% (p < 0.05) as compared with treatment with levodopa alone. Four patients became slightly more dyskinetic during entacapone treatment than before it. The combination of entacapone and levodopa was well tolerated, judged by the lack of significant changes in hemodynamic and safety variables.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
We investigated clinical response and pharmacokinetics of levodopa when entacapone, a catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor, was administered concomitantly with either a standard (Std) or a controlled-release (CR) levodopa/carbidopa preparation to 12 patients with Parkinson's disease. An open cross-over study consisted of the initial study day without entacapone followed by two 10-day treatment periods with a study day at the end of each period. The patients who received entacapone (200 mg t.i.d. or q.i.d.) concomitantly with Std levodopa/carbidopa (200/50 mg t.i.d. or q.i.d.) during the first period received subsequently entacapone with CR levodopa/carbidopa (200/50 mg t.i.d. or q.i.d.), and vice versa. On the study days, the patients took the medication at 8 a.m. and the second dose 6 h later. We evaluated the disability before drug administration and then 1-h intervals for 8 h. Repeated blood samples were taken for analysis of plasma levodopa, 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD), dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), homovanillic acid (HVA), carbidopa, and entacapone. Entacapone decreased significantly the clinical disability with both Std and CR levodopa, slightly more with Std levodopa. The clinical response started earlier with Std levodopa whereas the "on"-time increased by about 1 h, equally with both levodopa preparations. Std levodopa produced 23% higher area under the curve (AUC) of levodopa than the CR preparation, but entacapone increased the AUC approximately equally, 33% with Std and 36% with CR levodopa. Entacapone slightly decreased Cmax of levodopa in combination with Std levodopa, whereas it increased that with CR levodopa. The AUC of 3-OMD was about 20% smaller after Std than after CR levodopa. Entacapone decreased the AUC of 3-OMD by 38-40% with both levodopa preparations. Entacapone did not modify the AUC levels of carbidopa although its bioavailability was less from CR levodopa than from Std levodopa. In three patients levodopa dosage was reduced when on Std levodopa because of nausea. Otherwise, the treatments were well tolerated. The study shows that entacapone is an effective COMT inhibitor when combined with either Std levodopa or CR levodopa.
The effect of selegiline (L-deprenyl) on plasma catecholamines, clinical response, and drug tolerability was studied in 13 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with L-Dopa/benserazide and entacapone, a peripheral catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor, in a placebo-controlled double-blind study. An L-Dopa test was performed on 3 study days. The first study day was with L-Dopa/benserazide only (control), the second after 14 days of treatment with 200 mg entacapone taken concomitantly with L-Dopa/benserazide in combination with either selegiline (10 mg daily) or placebo. After a 2-week washout period, selegiline and placebo treatments were switched, and the third study day was after 14 days of treatment. During the study days, clinical response was evaluated at 30-min intervals for 6 h, by using the motor score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). In addition, repeated blood pressure measurements were made, and plasma samples were taken for analysis of L-Dopa, 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD), dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid (DOPAC), homovanillic acid (HVA), dopamine, noradrenaline, and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylethylene glycol (MHPG). Monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) and COMT enzyme activities were measured from platelets and erythrocytes, respectively. Entacapone improved the clinical response to L-Dopa during both selegiline and placebo (p < 0.001) treatments. The improvement was more marked during combined selegiline and entacapone treatment than with entacapone alone (p < 0.01). Entacapone significantly increased plasma L-Dopa and DOPAC levels and decreased plasma 3-OMD and MHPG levels both with selegiline and placebo. Selegiline partially inhibited the entacapone-induced increase of plasma DOPAC. Plasma dopamine and noradrenaline levels did not change. Entacapone decreased erythrocyte COMT activity by > 35% (p < 0.001), and platelet MAO-B activity was almost completely inhibited by selegiline (p < 0.001). One patient withdrew because of diarrhea, dizziness, and loss of sleep when receiving selegiline treatment. Otherwise no differences in adverse events, mean daily blood pressures, or other safety parameters were observed between selegiline and placebo treatments. Our results suggest that entacapone can be safely administered together with L-Dopa and selegiline in patients with PD, although further studies with larger number of patients and longer treatment periods are necessary to confirm this finding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.