ObjectivesThe objective of this work was to apply quantitative and semi-quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) methods to evaluate lung perfusion in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).Materials and MethodsIn this prospective trial 41 subjects, including healthy control (control) and IPF subjects, were studied using DCE-MRI at baseline. IPF subjects were then followed for 1 year, progressive IPF (IPFprog) were distinguished from stable IPF (IPFstable) subjects based on a decline in percent predicted FVC (FVC%p) or DLCO (DLCO%p) measured during followup visits. 35/41 subjects were retained for final baseline analysis at (control: N=15; IPFstable: N=14; IPFprog: N=6). Seven measures and their coefficients of variation (CV) were derived using temporally resolved DCE-MRI. Two sets of global and regional comparisons were made: control versus IPF groups, and control versus IPFstableversus IPFprog groups, using linear regression analysis. Each measure was compared to FVC%p, DLCO%p, and the lung clearance index (LCI%p) using a Spearman rank correlation.ResultsDCE-MRI identified regional perfusion differences between control and IPF subjects using first moment transit time (FMTT), contrast uptake slope (SLOPE), and pulmonary blood flow (PBF) (p≤0.05), while global averages did not. FMTT was shorter for IPFprog compared to both IPFstable (p=0.004) and control groups (p=0.023). Correlations were observed between PBF CV and DLCO%p (rs=−0.48, p=0.022) and %LCI (rs=+0.47, p=0.015). Significant group differences were detected in age (p<0.001), DLCO%p (p<0.001), FVC%p (p=0.001), and LCI%p (p=0.007).ConclusionsGlobal analysis obscures regional changes in pulmonary hemodynamics in IPF using DCE-MRI in IPF. Decreased FMTT may be a candidate marker for IPF progression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.