Physical characteristics of rubber network structures usually enumerated and discussed are network chain density, crosslink functionality, average chain length between crosslinks, entanglements which act somewhat like crosslinks, and free chain ends which are network defects. Chemical factors include structure of the chain molecules, type of crosslinks, whether monosulfide, disulfide or polysulfide, or direct carbon-to-carbon bonds. Side effects of vulcanization reactions such as chain scission or combination of minor quantities of chemical fragments from the vulcanizing system are also recognized. One might think that these variables would be adequate to account for physical properties of elastomers but explanations of strength aspects of vulcanizates are still unsatisfactory. Something is missing in these considerations, that is, the distribution of crosslinks along a main chain or the length sequences of monomer units in network chains. Usually a random distribution is implicitly assumed. If the distribution is always random and nothing can be done about it and it cannot be measured anyway, there may seem to be little point in writing about it. However, an ideally random distribution for all crosslinking systems and polymers seems very improbable. The importance of network chain length distribution for physical properties has been, of course, well recognized in theory. Bueche's calculations showed that viscoelastic resistance to deformation increased markedly with increased crosslink functionality, that is, as more chains are involved in the displacement of a crosslink. His molecular theory of tensile strength was based on the concept of short, overloaded network chains which snapped and transferred their loads to neighboring chains. An alternate point of view is that short chains are detrimental because they do not stress orient as well as longer chains.
X-ray diffraction evidence has shown that a crystalline structure can be produced in rubber by stretching or by freezing. In the former case, a fiber diagram is generally secured, in the latter, Debye-Scherrer rings. When raw rubber was stretched to moderate elongations and frozen an intense fiber diagram was found, showing that the crystallization proceeded from nuclei set up by the stretching. A series of diffraction patterns illustrating the effect are reproduced. The geometrical conditions of stretching under which ``higher orientation'' occurs in stretched rubber were studied by photometric measurements of the relative densities of the first two equatorial spots. Graphs are included demonstrating the effect of variations in gauge, width, length and elongation of the specimens. Higher orientation occurs when the percent contraction in gauge exceeds the percent contraction in width. The different physical structures of vulcanized pure gum stocks became apparent in the ``higher orientation'' characteristics, although the same diffraction pattern was secured. A correlation of the results with current views on the micellar or secondary structure of rubber and the crystallization of supercooled liquids is attempted.
Calculations and experimental results both indicated that effects of a molecular weight distribution of network chains may become evident in swelling pressure curves under favorable circumstances. More precise experiments are required to establish this definitely. The calculations assume that a simple integration such as is used for a continuous medium may be applied to molecular units of structure deduced from the kinetic theory of rubber elasticity. The validity of this can only be determined by further comparisons with experience. Refinement of the theory might take into account interactions of the units.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.