To study the effects of nonosmotic and nonvolumetric factors that may influence secretion of vasopressin, serum Na+, K+, and osmolality (Osm), hemoglobin, hematocrit, plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP), aldosterone (PA), and renin activity (PRA) were measured in five men and three women (26-50 yr, 73 +/- 4 kg) before and after 24 h of mild dehydration (food but no fluid) and seven times during the 1st h after rehydration with 10 ml/kg of tap water (17.5 +/- 0.5 degrees C) consumed in 105 s (range 35-240 s). Dehydration increased mean serum Na+ 3.7 +/- 0.7 meq/l (P less than 0.05), osmolality 9.1 +/- 1.1 mosmol/kg (P less than 0.05), and AVP from a hydrated level of 1.7 +/- 0.2 to 3.3 +/- 0.5 pg/ml (delta = 1.6 pg/ml, P less than 0.05). After rehydration AVP fell to 2.4 +/- 0.3 pg/ml (P less than 0.05) within 3 min and reached the water-replete level of 1.8 +/- 0.3 pg/ml 9 min after drinking started. Serum Na+ and Osm did not change until 30-60 min after drinking. No significant changes occurred in PRA, hemogloblin, hematocrit, or calculated delta in plasma volume, but PA increased from 11.1 +/- 1.5 ng/dl after dehydration to 15.6 +/- 2.6 ng/dl (P less than 0.05) between 30 and 60 min after drinking. The rapid fall in plasma AVP after rehydration took place in the absence of the expected changes in the primary regulators of plasma AVP (i.e., osmolality and plasma volume), with no change in blood pressure. The results suggest that oropharyngeal factors, alone or combined with gastric stimuli, are implicated.
To determine the effect of external water pressure per se on intercompartmental fluid volume shifts, plasma and urine electrolytes, osmotic and endocrine responses were compared in four men (21-22 yr) during 8 h of water immersion (TH2O = 34.4 degrees C) and during 8 h of chair rest (Ta = 22.5 degrees C), followed by16 h of bed rest in both regimens. Water intake was 1,800 ml during 8-h exposures. Urine volume during immersion was 2,954 ml/8 h and 1,538 ml/8 h (P less than 0.01) during chair rest; the respective decreases in extracellular volume (ECV) were 2,230 ml/8 h and 1,892 ml/8 h. Losses from the intersititial volume (1.81 vs. 1.67 liters) and plasma volume (0.43 vs. 0.23 liters) during immersion and chair rest, respectively, were approximately proportional to theri normal ratios. With a negative H2O balance (corrected for blood withdrawal) during immersion of 1,234 ml and a positive balance (190 ml) during chair rest, there appeared to be a shift of ECV to the intracellular compartment in both regimens. There was suppression of both plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP) and renin activity (PRA) during chair rest and immersion. It appears that the increased central blood volume, as opposed to increased plasma osmolality, is the primary stimulus for AVP suppression. In hyperhydrated subjects, about half (6.7%) of the immersion plasma volume loss of 12.6% could be attributed to orthostatic responses associated with the upright body position during chair rest and the remaining half to the external water pressure.
To quantify the effect of 60 mm Hg lower-body positive pressure (LBPP) on orthostatic blood-volume shifts, the mass densities (+/- 0.1 g.1-1) of antecubital venous blood and plasma were measured in five men (27-42 years) during combined tilt table/antigravity suit inflation and deflation experiments. The densities of erythrocytes, whole-body blood, and of the shifted fluid were computed and the magnitude of fluid and protein shifts were calculated during head-up tilt (60 degrees) with and without application of LBPP. During 30-min head-up tilt with LBPP, blood density (BD) and plasma density (PD) increased by 1.6 +/- 0.3 g.1-1, and by 0.8 +/- 0.2 g.1-1 (+/- SD) (N = 9), respectively. In the subsequent period of tilt without LBPP, BD and PD increased further to + 3.6 +/- 0.9 g.1-1, and to + 2.0 +/- 0.7 g.1-1 (N = 7), compared to supine control. The density increases in both periods were significant (p less than 0.05). Erythrocyte density remained unaltered with changes in body position and pressure suit inflation/deflation. Calculated shifted-fluid densities (FD) during tilt with LBPP (1006.0 +/- 1.1 g.1-1, N = 9), and for subsequent tilt after deflation (1002.8 +/- 4.1 g.1-1, N = 7) were different from each other (p less than 0.03). The plasma volume decreased by 6.0 +/- 1.2% in the tilt-LBPP period, and by an additional 6.4 +/- 2.7% of the supine control level in the subsequent postdeflation tilt period. The corresponding blood volume changes were 3.7 +/- 0.7% (p less than 0.01), and 3.5 +/- 2.1% (p less than 0.05), respectively. Thus, about half of the postural hemo-concentration occurring during passive head-up tilt was prevented by application of 60 mm Hg LBPP.
Blood pressure, pulse rate (PR), serum osmolality and electrolytes, as well as plasma vasopressin (PVP) and plasma renin activity (PRA), were measured in five men and two women [mean age 38.6 +/- 3.9 (SE) yr] before, during, and after inflation of an antigravity suit that covered the legs and abdomen. After 24 h of fluid deprivation the subjects stood quietly for 3 h: the 1st h without inflation, the 2nd with inflation to 60 Torr, and the 3rd without inflation. A similar control noninflation experiment was conducted 10 mo after the inflation experiment using five of the seven subjects except that the suit was not inflated during the 3-h period. Mean arterial pressure increased by 14 +/- 4 (SE) Torr (P less than 0.05) with inflation and decreased by 15 +/- 5 Torr (P less than 0.05) after deflation. Pulse pressure (PP) increased by 7 +/- 2 Torr (P less than 0.05) with inflation and PR decreased by 11 +/- 5 beats/min (P less than 0.05); PP and PR returned to preinflation levels after deflation. Plasma volume decreased by 6.1 +/- 1.5% and 5.3 +/- 1.6% (P less than 0.05) during hours 1 and 3, respectively, and returned to base line during inflation. Inflation decreased PVP from 6.8 +/- 1.1 to 5.6 +/- 1.4 pg/ml (P less than 0.05) and abolished the significant rise in PRA during hour 1. Both PVP and PRA increased significantly after deflation: delta = 18.0 +/- 5.1 pg/ml and 4.34 +/- 1.71 ng angiotensin I X ml-1 X h-1, respectively. Serum osmolality and Na+ and K+ concentrations were unchanged during the 3 h of standing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
After the Germanwings accident, the French Safety Investigation Authority (BEA) recommended that the World Health Organization (WHO) and European Community (EC) develop clear rules for the duty of notification process. Aeromedical practitioners (AMEs) face a dilemma when considering the duty of notification and conflicts between pilot privacy and public and third-party safety. When balancing accountability, knowledge of the duty of notification process, legislation and the clarification of a doctor’s own set of values should be assessed a priori. Relatively little is known of the magnitude of this problem in aviation safety. To address this, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) database was searched to identify fatal accidents during 2015 in the United States in which a deceased pilot used a prescribed medication or had a disease that potentially reduced pilot performance and was not reported to the AME. Altogether, 202 finalized accident reports with toxicology were available from (the year) 2015. In 5% (10/202) of these reports, the pilot had either a medication or a disease not reported to an AME which according to the accident investigation was causal to the fatal accident. In addition, the various approaches to duty of notification in aviation in New Zealand, Finland and Norway are discussed. The process of notification of authorities without a pilot’s express permission needs to be carried out by using a guidance protocol that works within legislation and professional responsibilities to address the pilot and the public, as well as the healthcare provider. Professional guidance defining this duty of notification is urgently needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.