Introduction
The demands on healthcare are intensifying and access times are rising. The appropriateness of telemedicine amongst the physiotherapy profession remains under question. This review aimed to explore the current evidence base and highlight methods in which services can be embedded more consistently. With the push for new methods of service delivery, this project fits well with the current climate.
Methods
Electronic databases, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PubMed were searched using basic and combination key terms without date restriction.
Ethical Approval
Ethical approval was not required as the work is not considered research.
Results/Discussion
Physiotherapy is considered by many, a hands‐on profession and failure to meet this expectation appears to take precedent over quality of care. Staff with prior experience view telephone services more positively and engage better. Interestingly no specific training requirements have been set to aid the development of staff in this new role. Telephone services are able to manage a modest proportion of patients however care must be taken to avoid increases in consulting time and costs via mechanisms such as repeated consultations. Patient choice, staff satisfaction and wider access also impacts on acceptability of these services for patients and staff.
Conclusion(s)
Telephone services offer flexible, alternative options for patients and support variation and skill development for staff however appear less satisfactory than usual care. Further research into areas such as patient expectation, staff training and evaluation of costs will develop the evidence base and support the use of telephone services within the physiotherapy profession.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.