No abstract

The application of succinate dehydrogenase inhibiting (SDHI) and quinone outside inhibiting (QoI) fungicide chemistries is a primary tactic in the management of early blight of potato, caused by Alternaria solani. Resistance to QoIs in A. solani has been attributed to the F129L mutation, while resistance to SDHIs is conferred by five different known point mutations on three AsSdh genes. In total, 1,323 isolates were collected from 2013 through 2015 across 11 states to determine spatial and temporal frequency distribution of these mutations. A real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect the presence of the F129L mutation. Molecular detection of SDHI-resistant isolates was performed using SDH multiplex PCR specific for point mutations in AsSdhB, AsSdhC, or AsSdhD genes and mismatch amplification analysis PCR detecting the point mutations in AsSdhB. Previous work in our research group determined that substitutions of histidine for tyrosine (H278Y) or arginine (H278R) at codon 278 on the AsSdhB gene were the most prevalent mutations, detected in 46 and 21% of A. solani isolates, respectively, collected in 2011 to 2012, and uniformly distributed among six sampled states. In contrast, the substitution of histidine for arginine (H134R) at codon 134 in the AsSdhC gene was the most prevalent mutation in 2013 through 2015, identified in 36% of isolates, compared with 7.5% of isolates recovered in 2011 to 2012. Substitutions of histidine for arginine (H133R) at codon 133 and aspartic acid for glutamic acid (D123E) at codon 123 in the AsSdhD gene were detected in 16 and 12%, respectively, in the A. solani population by 2015 and were recovered across a wide range of states, compared with 15 and 1.5% of isolates collected in 2011 to 2012, respectively. Overall, SDHI- and QoI-resistant isolates were detected at high frequencies across all years, with evidence of significant spatial variability. Future research will investigate whether these results are due to differences in parasitic fitness.

Rice sheath blight disease (ShB), caused by Rhizoctonia solani, gives rise to significant grain yield losses. The present study evaluated the efficacy of Integral ® , the commercial liquid formulation of Bacillus subtilis strain MBI 600, against rice ShB and for plant growth promotion. In greenhouse studies, four log concentrations of Integral (from 2.2×10 6 to 2.2×10 9 cfu/mL) were used as seed treatment (ST). After 25 d, seedlings were dipped (SD) into Integral prior to transplanting. At 30 d after transplanting (DAT), leaf sheaths were inoculated with immature sclerotia of the pathogen. At 45 DAT, a foliar spray (FS) with Integral was applied to some treatments. The fungicide control was 50% carbendazim at 1.0 g/L, and a nontreated control was also included. Overall, there were 10 treatments, each with five replications. ShB severity was rated at 52 DAT, and seedling height and number of tillers per plant were rated at 60 DAT. In 2009, two field trials evaluated Integral at 2.2×10 8 and 2.2×10 9 cfu/mL. Integral was applied as ST, and seedlings were produced in a nursery bed. After 32 d, seedlings were treated with Integral as SD and transplanted into 10 m 2 blocks. Foliar sprays were given at 45 and 60 DAT. There were seven treatments, each with eight replications arranged as a factorial randomized complete block design. At 20 DAT, the plots were broadcast inoculated with R. solani produced on rice grains. Seedling height before transplanting, ShB severity at 90 DAT, and grain yield at harvest were recorded. Integral at 2.2×10 9 cfu/mL provided significant increase of seedling heights over other treatments under greenhouse conditions. The Integral treatments of ST + SD + FS at 2.2×10 9 cfu/mL significantly suppressed ShB over other treatments. In field studies, Integral provided significant increase of seedling height in nursery, and number of tillers per plant, compared with the control. ShB severity was significantly suppressed with higher concentrations of Integral compared to lower concentrations. Grain yield were the highest at an Integral concentration of 2.2×10 9 cfu/mL. Overall, Integral significantly reduced ShB severity, enhanced seedling growth, number of tillers per plant and grain yield as ST + SD + FS at the concentration of 2.2×10 9 cfu/mL under the conditions evaluated.

Pink rot is an important disease of potato with worldwide distribution. Severe yield and quality losses have been reported at harvest and in postharvest storage. Under conditions favoring disease development, pink rot severity can continue to increase from the field to storage and from storage to transit, causing further losses. Prediction of pink rot disease development in storage has great potential for growers to intervene at an earlier stage of disease development to minimize economic losses. Pink rot disease is estimated as percent rot confined on the interval (0 or 1, corresponding to 0% as no disease and 100% as maximum disease). In this study, beta regression is considered over the traditional ordinary least squares regression (linear regression) for fitting continuous response variables bounded on the unit interval (0,1). This method is considered a good alternative to data transformation and analysis by linear regression. The percentages of incidence of pink rot in tubers at harvest, yield, and days after harvest were used as study covariates to predict pink rot development from 32 to 78 days postharvest. Results demonstrate that the interaction between percentage of pink rot at harvest and yield is a significant predictor (P < 0.0001) of the beta regression model. A linear regression model was also designed to compare the results with the proposed beta regression model. Linear predictors observed in diagnostic plots with linear regression model was found to not be constant and an adjusted R2 (0.49) was obtained. The pseudo R2 (0.56) and constant variance for this study suggests that the beta regression function is adequate for predicting the development of pink rot during storage. The use of the beta prediction model could help growers decide whether to apply a fungicide to tubers going into storage or to market their crop before significant storage losses are incurred.

No abstract