Introduction. Currently, various methods and modifications of radical prostatectomy (RP) have been developed and tested, aimed at preventing and minimizing the development of urinary incontinence (UI). However, UI remains an urgent problem in patients who undergo RP, especially at the early follow-up stages.Objective. To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of modified reconstructive techniques for vesicourethral anastomosis in radical prostatectomy for the prevention of urinary incontinence with respect to the standard technique at different follow-up periods.Materials and methods. Design: single-centre, clinical, simple, comparative, parallel-group study with retrospective and prospective material evaluation, conducted in 2017 – 2022. Patients: men with verified prostate cancer cT1a – 2cN0 – xM0 without decompensated comorbidities. Age: 45 – 78 years. Retrospective part — group (G) 1: 90 patients who underwent non-nerve-sparing open retropubic RP with a "classic" vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA). Prospective part — G2: 46 patients who underwent similar surgery with modified VUA in two variations: without and with prostatic urethra-sparing — G2a (n = 25) and G2b (n = 21), respectively. Initial examination: standard preoperative laboratory and instrumental examination, assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) using the IPSS-QoL questionnaire. Follow-up examination: objective evaluation of UI according to established criteria and subjective assessment using the ICIQ-SF questionnaire, tracking the dynamics of LUTS using IPSS-QoL. Follow-up periods: 0-point (after catheter removal), 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (exit-point); the dynamics of recovery of urinary continence (UC) was determined monthly. Statistical analysis: Statistica ver.10.0 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) using non-parametric methods (CL p < 0.05 at a = 0.05)Results. Preoperative demographic, questionnaire and instrumental statistics did not differ (p > 0.05) between the groups, confirming the homogeneity of the samples. After RP, the urethral catheter was removed in a period of 7 to 21 days. There was no difference (p > 0.05) in the duration of drainage between the groups. Total urinary continence (TUC) immediately after catheter removal was detected in G1, G2a and G2b in 20.0%, 44.0% and 57.1% of cases, respectively. Subsequent objective monitoring of UC recovery from 1 month showed differences (p < 0.001) between the groups in the dynamics of rehabilitation during the year. The improvement in UC over the one-year follow-up period was cumulatively achieved in G1, G2a and G2b in 48.9%, 44.0% and 33.3% of cases, respectively. Total UI persisted in G1 and G2a by month 12 in 22.2% and 8.0% of patients, respectively, and was not detected in G2b. The severity of UI by the end of the follow-up according to the ICIQ-SF data was the most pronounced (p < 0.001) in patients from G1. TUC-patients in all groups from 1 month showed a marked decrease in the severity of obstructive and irritative LUTS and improved quality of life, with no differences (0.157 < p < 0.390) in IPSS-QoL values between groups.Conclusions. The use of modified VUA reconstruction techniques made it possible, compared with the standard one, to achieve high continence rates in patients both immediately after the removal of the urethral catheter and at subsequent follow-up periods, without the formation of severe iatrogenic obstruction. Prostatic urethra-sparing modification is the most effective technique that provided the rehabilitation of UI to a complete and/or social level in all patients within a year after surgery.
Background. Bladder neck preservation during retropubic radical prostatectomy (rRP) promotes a protective effect on urinary continence compared to standard rRP.Aim. To assessment of possible predictors for positive surgical margin (PSM) recognition is an important step.Materials and methods. 136 patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) were studied in the study. Group 1, 90 patients (retrospective assessment), underwent standard rRP, group 2, 46 patients (prospective assessment), underwent rRP modified by bladder neck preservation with a part of the proximal prostatic urethra. The clinical and pathological stages of PCa were assessed; the groups were compared to the parameter PSM. Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric statistical methods.Results. Both groups were comparable in age and baseline total prostate specific antigen (PSA) but differed in prostate volume and Gleason score. Also, there were differences in clinical and pathological stages of PCa. PSM-patients had more aggressive PCa according to the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) and TNM classifications and had higher progression risk prognosis stages. In PSM-patients, correlations were determined between prostate volume and baseline Gleason index (r = 0.338; p >0.05); baseline total PSA and Gleason score before (r = 0.529; p >0.05) and after (r = 0.310; p >0.05) rRP, respectively. Nevertheless, the incidence of PSM among all subjects was 6.6 % of cases, while in groups 1 and 2 was 7.8 and 4.3 % of cases, respectively. In this way, surgical techniques that maximize bladder neck preservation with a part of proximal prostatic urethra have no significant effect on PSM. Ranges of total PSA, clinical stage of PCa, Gleason score and progression risk stages (prognostic group for PCa) were determined as predictors of PSM. Their use will make it possible to establish patient selection criteria for bladder neck preservation with proximal prostatic urethra during rRP.Conclusion. The identified predictors will allow determining during clinical staging minimal risks of detecting PSM. The rRP modified by bladder neck preservation with part of the proximal prostatic urethra does not increase the incidence of PSM compared to the standard rRP. The feasibility of this technique should be related to total PSA, clinical stage of PCa, Gleason score, and the progression risk stage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.