No abstract

A comparison of revisional and primary bariatric surgeryBackground: Revisional surgery is an important component of addressing weight regain and complications following primary bariatric surgery. Owing to provincial need and the complexity of this patient population, a specialized multidisciplinary revision clinic was developed. We sought to characterize patients who undergo revision surgery and compare their outcomes with primary bariatric surgery clinic data. Methods:We completed a retrospective chart review of bariatric revision clinic patients compared with primary bariatric surgery patients from December 2009 to June 2014. Results:We reviewed the charts of 2769 primary bariatric clinic patients, 886 of whom had bariatric surgery, and 534 revision bariatric clinic patients, 83 of whom had revision surgery. Fewer revision clinic patients underwent surgery than primary clinic patients (22% v. 32%). The mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 44.7 ± 9.5 in revision patients compared with 45.7 ± 7.6 in primary bariatric surgery patients. Most revision patients had a prior vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG; 48%) or a laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB; 24%). Bands were removed in 36% of all LAGB patients presenting to clinic. Of the 134 procedures performed in the revision clinic, 83 were bariatric weight loss surgeries, and 51 were band removals. Revision clinic patients experienced a significant decrease in BMI (from 44.7 ± 9.5 to 33.8 ± 7.5, p < 0.001); their BMI at 12-month follow-up was similar to that of primary clinic patients (34.5 ± 7.0, p = 0.7). Complications were significantly more frequent in revision patients than primary patients (41% v. 15%, p < 0.001). Conclusion:A bariatric revision clinic manages a wide variety of complex patients distinct from those seen in a primary clinic. Operative candidates at the revision clinic are chosen based on favourable medical, anatomic and psychosocial factors, keeping in mind the resource constraints of a public health care system. Contexte : La chirurgie de révision est une intervention importante lors d'une reprise de poids ou lors de complications à la suite d'une chirurgie bariatrique primaire. Compte tenu des besoins provinciaux et de la complexité de cette population de patients, une clinique de révision multidisciplinaire spécialisée a été créée. Nous avons voulu caractériser les patients qui subissent une chirurgie de révision et comparer leurs résultats aux données de la clinique de chirurgie bariatrique primaire.Méthodes : Nous avons procédé à un examen rétrospectif des dossiers des patients de la clinique de révision bariatrique par rapport aux patients ayant subi une chirurgie bariatrique primaire entre décembre 2009 et juin 2014.Résultats : Nous avons examiné les dossiers de 2769 patients de la clinique bariatrique primaire, dont 886 avaient subi une chirurgie bariatrique, et 534 patients de la clinique de révision, dont 83 avaient subi une chirurgie de révision. Un moins grand nombre de patients de la clinique de révision ont subi une c...

Background: Long-term complications and lack of weight loss have caused a surge in laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) removal. This study reviews the trend of LAGB removal and examines outcomes of patients undergoing subsequent revision bariatric surgery at a single tertiary care centre in Canada. Methods:All LAGB removals performed between January 2008 and December 2016 were reviewed. A subset of patients who underwent revision surgery was then analyzed for patient demographics, weight, body mass index and postoperative complications. Results:During the study period, 211 patients underwent LAGB removal (87.7% female). Most bands were inserted out of province. Reasons for band removal included dysphagia, band slip and weight recidivism. Fifty-nine patients (28%) underwent revision surgery at a mean of 12.8 ± 9.3 (range 0-55) months after LAGB removal. Mean age was 47 ± 9.7 (range 26-63) years, and mean pre-LAGB weight was 131.0 ± 30.0 kg. Following LAGB, the mean weight decreased to 120.5 ± 26.4 kg, but most regained weight after removal to a mean prerevision weight of 125.1 ± 27.0 kg. The lowest mean weight was achieved 12 months after revision surgery (98.7 ± 30.2 kg). The mean percent total weight loss was not significantly different after revision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared with revision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (22.8 ± 9.6% v. 17.5 ± 6.5%, p = 0.179). The overall revision surgery 30-day complication rate was 18.6% and increased to 23.7% long-term. No deaths occurred. Conclusion:The number of LAGB removals is increasing. Revision bariatric surgery leads to improved weight loss; however, revision surgery is associated with complications.

Objective Patients with congenital external auditory canal (EAC) abnormalities are at risk of developing cholesteatoma and often undergo surveillance imaging to detect it. The aims of this systematic review are to determine the incidence of cholesteatoma in patients with congenital aural atresia (CAA) and patients with congenital EAC stenosis and to investigate the most common age of cholesteatoma diagnosis. This information will help clinicians decide which patients require surveillance scanning, as well as the timing of imaging. Data Sources Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases. Review Methods A systematic literature review following the PRISMA guidelines was performed. The data sources were searched by 2 independent reviewers, and articles were included that reported on CAA or congenital EAC stenosis with a confirmed diagnosis of cholesteatoma. The selected articles were screened separately by 3 reviewers before reaching a consensus on the final articles to include. Data collection on the number of patients with cholesteatoma and the age of diagnosis was performed for these articles. Results Eight articles met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of cholesteatoma was 1.7% (4/238) in CAA and 43.0% (203/473) in congenital EAC stenosis. The majority of patients with congenital EAC stenosis that developed cholesteatoma were diagnosed at age <12 years. Conclusion CAA is associated with a low risk of cholesteatoma formation, and surveillance imaging is unnecessary in asymptomatic patients. EAC stenosis is strongly associated with cholesteatoma, and a surveillance scan for these patients is recommended prior to 12 years of age with close follow-up into adulthood.