We assessed demographics, diagnoses, course, severity, impact and treatment of primary headache outpatients from records in the Headache and Pain Clinic, Neurological Department, Zürich University Hospital. All outpatients seen from 1996 to 1998 for migraine, tension–type headache, and both, were included. Diagnoses, drug, physical and alternative treatments before and after referral were listed. Descriptive statistics were used for differences between the general population and this sample, the diagnoses, and treatments. The coexistence of migraine and tension–type headache, and the high frequencies of headache days would have excluded most migraine patients from typical drug trials: at best, only one third were eligible. The socioeconomic impact of combined and difficult syndromes calls for comprehensive management beyond simple treatment with instant relief drugs. The diagnostic and therapeutic practices of referring physicians exposed a deficit of information on headache, and a need for relevant education.

The Headache and Pain Clinic (HPC) is a unit of the Zürich Neurology Department, established in 1966. In the present study demographic features, clinical characteristics and medical management of primary and tertiary care patients were compared in two groups of 181 patients each, seen by general practitioners (GPs) or the HPC, respectively, for primary headaches in 1998. There was a preponderance of women and the socially underprivileged in both samples. Chronic headache was overrepresented in the HPC (44.7%). Loss of work for >2 months was found exclusively in the HPC (9.9%). Of the GP patients, 40% were using triptans and 26.5% in the HPC. One-third of both groups had had complementary and alternative medical treatment. Differences in management strategies reflected differences in headache severity and chronicity. Results indicated that remaining shortcomings of diagnosis and treatment of headache in primary care could be minimized by involving GPs in similar non-commercial studies.

A granulocytopenic mouse model was used to elucidate the impact of dose spacing on the activity of netilmicin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A thigh infection was produced and then treated with netilmicin combined with azlocillin. Netilmicin was injected subcutaneously at decreasing doses every 20 min to result in plasma-concentration-time curves similar to those observed in patients on intravenous netilmicin treatment. A once-daily regimen was simulated and compared to a simulated conventional schedule of every 8 h. Identical total amounts of drug were used in both groups of comparatively treated mice. Therapeutic efficacy was quantitated by repeated determinations of surviving organisms in thigh homogenates. Combination therapy was significantly more effective than azlocillin treatment alone. In combination regimens the simulated once-daily netilmicin schedule killed the target organisms faster than the simulated thrice-daily regimen and was significantly more efficacious by 24 and 32 h in two out of three strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa tested. It is concluded that the results of combination therapy of severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in the immunocompromised host might be improved by choosing an aminoglycoside dosage interval of 24 h instead of the conventional 8 h.

The impact of pre-treatment intervals on the antipseudomonal efficacy of gentamicin, ticarcillin and ceftazidime was studied in an experimental thigh infection model in normal and granulocytopenic mice. Human-equivalent doses were used for simulating human pharmacokinetic profiles of the two study 0-lactam drugs. A lethal inoculum of a virulent strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was injected into the thigh muscle. Treatment was started at various post-infection intervals. Antimicrobial efficacy was assessed by determinations of surviving organisms at the site of infection, and plasma drug concentrations were determined in the same mice. The age of infection had a substantial impact on antipseudomonal efficacy of the three study drugs even though high, brief supra-MIC concentrations of gentamicin and persistent supra-MIC concentrations of the /Mactam drugs were obtained. A pre-treatment interval of six or more hours abolished the bactericidal effect of all three study drugs despite accumulation of the drugs to multiple-MBC plasma concentrations. We believe that the impact of pre-treatment intervals on antimicrobial efficacy is of paramount importance for the interpretation of antimicrobial activity studies in experimental models of infection, although the mechanisms remain to be elucidated.