No abstract

A lamb growth trial was conducted to evaluate soybean meal and blood meal and to compare two experimental designs (a completely randomized design and a switchback design). A larger amount of variation was observed with the switchback than with the randomized design. A larger number of animals, longer treatment period or increased number of weighings may be needed to overcome end point weighing errors and decrease the variation in the switchback design. In both designs, there was a significantly greater conversion of protein to gain for blood meal (BM)-supplemented lambs than for soybean meal (SBM)-supplemented lambs. The relative value of BM compared with SBM was 251% (completely randomized design) or 296% (switchback design). Weighing steers 2 or 3 d at the beginning and end of the trial reduced variation and increased the probability of detecting differences in daily gain, gain/feed and protein efficiency when compared with a standard weighing method (once at the beginning and once at the end of the trial). Regressing 11 weekly weights on an average of one, two or three initial and final weights also reduced variation and increased the probability of detecting treatment differences. Regressions of weekly weights were more useful as the number of initial and final weights was decreased. Daily gain and gain/feed increased linearly (P less than .05) with protein level when BM or SBM was fed. A nonlinear model was used to predict protein requirement, maximum gain and relative protein values. There was a range in relative values for BM of 255 to 348% depending on the method of analysis used.

Intake and digestibility trials were conducted with sheep to evaluate the effect of adding various levels of a typical fibrous grass forage (neutral detergent fiber, NDF = 68%) to a high quality, low fiber (NDF = 22%) brassica forage. Four forage rape:orchardgrass hay diets (0, 40, 70, 100% rape content on a dry matter basis) were fed to groups of six Polled-Dorset crossbred growing wether lambs (39.6 kg) individually housed in metabolism crates. After a 7-d ad libitum intake period, a 7-d digestibility trial was conducted at 90% of the observed ad libitum intake level. Digestible dry matter intake (DDMI) per unit metabolic body weight increased as rape in the diet was increased from 0 to 70%, with increases in both dry matter intake and dry matter digestibility (DMD). However, DDMI was similar for lambs fed the 70 and 100% rape diets, with DMI decreasing to the same relative extent as DMD increased. Digestibility of the cell wall fraction of the two intermediate diets (40% rape and 70% rape) was lower than predicted from component forage digestibilities. This observation suggests the existence of an associative effect similar to that often reported when forage and concentrates are fed in various ratios. Forage brassicas appear to be utilized in the ruminant in a manner more typically resembling a concentrate than a forage.

Eighty-nine samples, 45 of standing forage and 44 of baled hay, were collected from alfalfa harvested at various maturities over three cuttings each during 2 yr. Alfalfa was cut and conditioned mechanically; samples of standing forage were collected by removing bunches of forage from windrows and freeze-drying them. Forage was allowed to field cure and was harvested at an average 80% DM as small rectangular bales; samples of baled hay were collected by coring bales after storing for 3 to 6 mo. Samples were analyzed for DM, ADF, total N, fractions of total N present as ADIN, N degraded at 0 h, and potentially degradable protein N. Ruminal protein degradation rates and escapes were estimated using an inhibitor in vitro system, assuming that ADIN was unavailable and that ruminal passage rate was .06/h. Standing forage contained smaller fractions of ADIN and N degraded at 0 h, contained a larger fraction of potentially degradable N, and had more rapid degradation rates and lower estimated protein escapes than baled hay. Mean degradation rates and estimated escapes were .171/h and 24% for standing forage and .075/h and 40% for baled hay. There were no differences in degradation rate or estimated escape because of harvest year, and neither was significantly related to maturity or to ADF concentration. Results indicate a significant advantage in ruminal protein escape, compared with grazed alfalfa, for alfalfa harvested and stored as hay.