In this retrospective study of the pediatric trauma group of German trauma society, issued to investigate the state of the art treatment of the supracondylar fracture of the humerus, 13 clinics took part. In this first part of our study we tested the epidemiology and effectivity of therapeutic interventions based on the classification of v. Laer. 886 fractures were included with an average patients age of 5.8 years (+/- 2.9). Causes of trauma was in 45% playing, followed by school/kindergarden and sports injuries. Fractures were initially classified according to v. Laer and showed following displacement: 35.4% Type I, 21.9% Type II, 18.1% Type III and 24.6% Type IV. 10 of the 886 cases (1.1%) were open fractures. Damages to nerves were described in 45 patients (5.1%) and only 7 (0.7%) had primary vessel lesions. 476 patients were treated by reduction of fragments, 72% using a closed technical approach and 28% using an open approach. 6% underwent a second resposition-maneuver, which was mainly observed after crossed Kirschner-wire in type-III-and-IV-fractures. Therapy was changed in 5.1% mostly of the cases were initially closed reduced and then fixed with a collar and cuff sling. 540 patients were seen at follow-up (61%). 81.1% of these patients showed symmetrical axis compared to the uninjured arm. A varus-deformity was noted in 11.7%, a valgus-deformity in 7.2%. Analysis of effectivity showed that the primarily used classification was not sufficient for prediction of the outcome after reposition and retention. Therefore the classification was modified based on 4 groups: Type I undisplaced, Type II displacement in one plane, Type III displacement in two planes and Type IV displacement in three spatial planes. Using this classification we could found that in group II 25% of reduction an 7% of retentions were ineffective. For group III and IV we found that > 20% of the retention proofed to be ineffective.
Supracondylar fracture of the humerus is the most frequently investigated fracture in children. However, systematic studies about postoperative growth patterns cannot be found in the literature. In this retrospective study, the authors attempt to delineate the configuration of supracondylar fractures which allow spontaneous correction of a malalignment or cause post-traumatic growth disturbances. The study included 256 children with supracondylar fracture of the humerus: 184 of them (71.9%) were available for longterm follow-up. The plain films of these children were reviewed and the Baumann and shaft-capitulum angles recorded. Spontaneous correction of a primarily displaced fracture was found in 13.0% ( n=21) of all fractures in the sagittal plane. Spontaneous correction in the frontal plane could not be shown. Growth disturbance was discovered in 10.5% ( n=16) in the frontal plane. No growth disturbance was demonstrated in the sagittal plane. The relatively small number of growth disturbances can be attributed to the low growth potential of the distal physeal plate of the humerus. Growth disturbances with secondary rotational errors were not observed in this study. Spontaneous corrections of alignment in the sagittal plane are only possible under a certain age. Spontaneous correction in the frontal plane, however, is inadequately assessed with this study. The design of a prospective study was formulated to assess how to improve the therapeutic management of supracondylar fractures and to answer additional open questions. Follow-up radiographs and standardized clinical evaluations have to be performed at the time of first free range of movement and 2 years after the trauma. This study will investigate whether therapeutic progress at follow-up is better evaluated with radiological or clinical means.
The following are the results and conclusions of a retrospective research study done on 886 patients with supracondylar fractures of the humerus. The study evaluates how effective the treatment procedures of the fractures are. The patients' fractures were categorized into four groups. It made it easier to differentiate between dislocated and undislocated fractures (see part I Weinberg A et al.). The following parameters were established to evaluate the treatment procedures and to create relevancy to the final outcome depending on the degree of difficulty of the fractures: Length of hospitalization, amount of repositioning procedures (including if an open or closed procedure was needed), amount of post repositioning procedures and the recommended change of therapy, method of retention and fixation, necessary metal removal, amount of check ups needed. The amount of x-ray exams could not be established due to insufficient documentation. The study showed a rather random pattern regarding length of hospitalization and the amount of check ups especially among type I and II patients. Open versus closed repositioning procedures did not seem to be advantageous. The implanted wires did not prevent infections. It just increased the treatment procedure by another hospitalization and anesthesia to remove the implanted wires. Physical therapy was not necessary and was only prescribed in cases of prolonged immobilization. The results of this study generated consequences regarding treatment procedures and developed a more efficient treatment protocol: Type I and II (dislocated and undislocated fractures in one plane) will be treated conservatively on an out-patient basis. Type I in a cast. Type II in a blount or plaster cast with flexed angle between 100 degrees and 130 degrees. Type III an IV (dislocated and undislocated fractures in two or three planes) will be treated if possible with a closed repositioning procedure. Otherwise a close repositioning procedure will be necessary and followed with some kind of KD-osteosynthese to capture the fracture. The patient will be hospitalized for a short period. The blount procedure will not be sufficient for this type of fracture. Therapy and procedure will be translated put in a perspective research study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.