Ten districts and three cities in Zimbabwe. Objective: To compare the yield and relative cost of identifying a case of tuberculosis (TB) using the three WHO-recommended algorithms (WHO2b, symptom inquiry only; WHO2d, chest X-ray [CXR] after a positive symptom inquiry; WHO3b, CXR only) and the Zimbabwe active case finding (ZimACF) algorithm (symptom inquiry plus CXR) to everyone. Design: Cross-sectional study using data from the ZimACF project. Results: A total of 38 574 people were screened from April to December 2017; 488 (1.3%) were diagnosed with TB using the ZimACF algorithm. Fewer TB cases would have been diagnosed with the WHO-recommended algorithms. This ranged from 7% fewer (34 cases) with WHO3b, 18% fewer (88 cases) with WHO2b and 25% fewer (122 cases) with WHO2d. The need for CXR ranged from 36% (WHO2d) to 100% (WHO3b). The need for bacteriological confirmation ranged from 7% (WHO2d) to 40% (ZimACF). The relative cost per case of TB diagnosed ranged from US$180 with WHO3b to US$565 for the ZimACF algorithm. Conclusion: The ZimACF algorithm had the highest case yield, but at a much higher cost per case than the WHO algorithms. It is possible to switch to algorithm WHO3b, but the trade-off between cost and yield needs to be reviewed by the Zimbabwean National TB Programme.

The study, including open access publishing costs, was funded by the World Diabetes Foundation, Bagsvaerd, Denmark. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.