No abstract

A needle-like apatite-leucite glass-ceramic was prepared in the SiO2-Al2O3-Na2O-K2O-P2O5-F system. Nucleation and crystallization processes were studied in bulk and powdered samples. The crystallization of leucite follows the mechanism of surface crystallization. After the precipitation of NaCaPO4 crystals and another unknown crystal phase, the formation of needle-like apatite is based on a volume nucleation and crystallization process. The mechanism of the formation of needle-like apatite differs to those of apatite precipitation in glass-ceramics. The morphology of needle-like apatite is comparable to that of apatite in natural teeth. The properties of the glass-ceramic, especially the good chemical durability, the optical properties, as well as mechanical and thermal properties allow glass-ceramic to be used as a main component in a bio-material for the veneering of metal restorations in dentistry.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate effect of a calcium hydroxide suspension [Ca(OH)2] or glutaraldehyde based dentine primer (GDP) to reduce tooth sensitivity after full crown preparation. Thirty-six patients were treated with Ca(OH)(2) on one tooth and with GDP on another. Patients completed a questionnaire regarding sensitivity during crown preparation, when the not-anaesthetized abutments were irritated [cotton pellet (20 degrees C)]. The teeth were tested before (T(0)) and after using the desensitizer (T(1)), again after 7 days (T(2)), 6 months (T(3)) and 30 months (T(4)). The results were registered on a visual analogue scale [0 (no pain)-100 (severe pain)]. The changes of tooth sensitivity between different testing times were analysed. The median and the (interquartile range) for the different time intervals for Ca(OH)(2) were DeltaT(0)-T(1): 5 (6-17), DeltaT(0)-T(2): 17 (14-32), and for GDP, DeltaT(0)-T(1): 9 (7-18) DeltaT(0)-T(2): 18 (16-33), the decreases in sensitivity were lower for DeltaT(0)-T(1) than for DeltaT(0)-T(2) for both desensitizers (P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference (P > 0.05) between the agents (DeltaT(0)-T(1), DeltaT(0)-T(2), DeltaT(3)-T(4)). Both substances might be useful in reducing tooth sensitivity after crown preparation, but no differences in the efficacy were found when comparing the materials.