Myeloma patients who are able to receive HDM plus ABMT following conventional chemotherapy achieve a high proportion of CRs, which may be associated with prolonged survival.
Summary. High-dose chemotherapy (melphalan) with autologous marrow stem cell support (AMSCS) results in high response rates in multiple myeloma (MM), with up to 50% of patients achieving complete remission. However, these remissions are generally not durable. As the cytokine interferon alpha has been shown to prolong partial response following conventional chemotherapy, this trial was conducted to evaluate its role following high-dose chemotherapy. 85 patients were randomly assigned to maintenance treatment with interferon alpha, 3 × 10 6 units/m 2 subcutaneously three times weekly until relapse or no further treatment following recovery from high-dose chemotherapy (melphalan 140-200 mg/m 2 or busulphan 16 mg/kg) combined with AMSCS. At 5·8 years following the accrual of the last patient in this trial, 38 patients had died, 17 in the interferon arm and 21 in the control arm. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the 42 patients randomized to interferon alpha was 46 months versus 27 months in the controls. Both overall survival and PFS, which were highly significant at median follow-up of 52 months, have now ceased to be significant, because most patients have ultimately succumbed to their disease. Interferon was tolerated by the majority of patients with very good compliance. Toxicity consisted mainly of flu-like symptoms and malaise which were usually self-limiting. The results of such a pilot study should be carefully interpreted and the benefits of interferon should be confirmed in larger multicentre studies in the setting of minimal residual disease following autologous transplantation.
IL-5 is induced locally in the lung and systemically in the circulation during allergic airways eosinophilic inflammation both in humans and experimental animals. However, the precise role of local and systemic IL-5 in the development of allergic airways eosinophilia remains to be elucidated. In our current study, we demonstrate that compared with their IL-5 ϩրϩ counterparts, IL-5 Ϫ / Ϫ mice lacked an IL-5 response both in the lung and peripheral blood, yet they released similar amounts of IL-4, eotaxin, and MIP-1 ␣ in the lung after ovalbumin (OVA) sensitization and challenge. At cellular levels, these mice failed to develop peripheral blood and airways eosinophilia while the responses of lymphocytes, neutrophils, and macrophages remained similar to those in IL-5 ϩրϩ mice. To dissect the relative role of local and systemic IL-5 in this model, we constructed a gene transfer vector expressing murine IL-5. Intramuscular IL-5 gene transfer to OVA-sensitized IL-5 Ϫ / Ϫ mice led to raised levels of IL-5 compartmentalized to the circulation and completely reconstituted airways eosinophilia upon OVA challenge, which was associated with reconstitution of eosinophilia in the bone marrow and peripheral blood. Significant airways eosinophilia was observed for at least 7 d in these mice. In contrast, intranasal IL-5 gene transfer, when rendered to give rise to a significant but compartmentalized level of transgene protein IL-5 in the lung, was unable to reconstitute airways eosinophilia in OVA-sensitized IL-5 Ϫ / Ϫ mice upon OVA-challenge, which was associated with a lack of eosinophilic responses in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Our findings thus provide unequivocal evidence that circulating but not local lung IL-5 is critically required for the development of allergic airways eosinophilia. These findings also provide the rationale for developing strategies to target circulating IL-5 and/or its receptors in bone marrow to effectively control asthmatic airways eosinophilia. ( J.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.