An efficient procedure for the extraction of high-quality RNA from woody plants without the use of phenol, organic solvents, or alcohol precipitation is described. The method employs commercially available spin-column matrices and mitigates the inhibitory effects of plant polysaccharides and polyphenolic compounds commonly observed on subsequent polymerase chain reaction amplification when conventional extraction methods are applied to woody plant species. The method described has been successfully used in the development of highly sensitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) techniques for the detection of a number of viruses in their woody hosts. The viruses detected included apple stem grooving capillovirus (ASGV), apple stem pitting virus, Prunus necrotic ringspot ilarvirus (PNRSV), grapevine fanleaf and Arabis mosaic nepoviruses, and grapevine leafroll-associated closterovirus type 3. The method described was equally effective for the extraction of viral RNA from either budwood, leaves, or flower blossoms as determined by the equivalent RT-PCR detection of ASGV and PNRSV from these tissues. Detection of viral RNA in samples of total plant RNA prepared using this method was found to be as sensitive as was previously described for the immunocapture RT-PCR technique.

Summary. Formaldehyde treated cherry mottle leaf virus (ChMLV) and the isolated coat protein were used successfully for the production of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. The monoclonal antibodies had a titre of 1:51 200 and consisted of IgG1 and IgG2. The antibodies reacted with all 11 isolates of ChMLV, from five locations in Canada and the USA, included in this study. Several serological procedures were assessed to compare their sensitivity for detecting ChMLV. Plate‐trapped antigen ELISA (PTA‐ELISA) and dot‐blot immunobinding assay (DBIA), using virus specific MAbs, were the most sensitive tests in this study. Triple antibody sandwich ELISA (TAS‐ELISA) and Western blot were found to be less sensitive. Dilution of the samples appeared to increase the sensitivity of both PTA‐ELISA and Western blot detection. Young leaves and flowers of Prunus avium were the best tissue for detecting the virus which could also be detected in the fruit and leaves of P. tomentosa. April and May were optimal for detection of the virus in the field, whereas both April to May and August to September were optimal for screenhouse‐grown plants.

No abstract