However, the scarcity of Te, the toxicity of Cd and Pb, and the instability of organic components in perovskite solar cells, significantly limit their sustainable and economical large-scale production. To date, the orthorhombic antimony (Sb) chalcogenides such as Sb 2 Se 3 , Sb 2 S 3 , Sb 2 (S, Se) 3 have been considered as promising light absorber materials for the next-generation solar cells with a PCE above ≈10% for Sb(S, Se) 3 . [7] The high light absorption coefficient (>10 5 cm −1 at a visible spectral range), tunable bandgap (1.10-1.30 eV), anisotropic charge transport, and long-term device stability promise antimony chalcogenides a higher PCE through systematically material and device engineering. [8,9] Moreover, Sb 2 Se 3 is very attractive in PV thanks to the abundance and less toxicity of Sb, S, and Se elements. [10][11][12] The quasi-1D crystalline structure of orthorhombic Sb 2 Se 3 , i.e., ribbon-like (Sb 4 Se 6 ) n units bonded by weak van der Waals (vdW) forces along [100] and [010] direction, provides unique photogenerated carrier transport behavior along with the ribbons and self-passivate the grain boundaries. [10,13,14] For high carrier mobility, the ribbons grew along [00l] direction is the most preferred orientation proved by theoretical calculation and experimental results since the ribbons are stacked by only vdW attraction and free from dangling bonds. [13,15] Moreover, the electron diffusion length (L e ) along [00l] direction is 1.7 µm that is higher than L e along [221] (0.3 µm). [15] However, antimony chalcogenides solar cells, particularly for the Sb 2 Se 3 solar cells still suffer the lower photovoltaic due to the high recombination sites in the interface and the deep state in the bandgap, although the overall efficiency of Sb 2 Se 3 solar cell has been increased from 2.26% to 9.2% over the last seven years. [10,[16][17][18][19][20] In addition, Sb 2 S 3 solar cells have been intensively investigated due to their wider bandgap (1.7 eV) than that of the Sb 2 Se 3 (1.2 eV); [21] however, the low photocurrent of Sb 2 S 3 becomes a challenge that needs to be further overcome.To achieve the desired carrier transportation along the nanoribbons normal to the substrate direction, it has been demonstrated that the seed layer could regulate the nucleus and grain growth for the noncubic Sb 2 Se 3 film. Particularly, a seed layer of identical crystalline material is frequently used to fabricate directional Sb 2 Se 3 nanoribbons. For example, Sb 2 Se 3 seeds have been utilized during the sublimation growth of Sb 2 Se 3 , [22][23][24]