In order to assess the relative contribution of aerobic processes to running velocity (v), 27 male athletes were selected on the basis of their middle-distance performances over 800, 1500, 3000 or 5000 m, during the 1987 track season. To be selected for study, the average running velocity (v) corresponding to their performances had to be superior to 90% of the best French v of the season. Maximum O2 consumption (VO2max) and energy cost of running (C) had been measured within the 2 months preceding the track season, which, together with oxygen consumption at rest (VO2rest) allowed us to calculate the maximal v that could be sustained under aerobic conditions: vamax = (VO2max - VO2rest) x C-1. The treadmill running v corresponding to a blood lactate of 4 mmol.l-1 (vla4), was also calculated. In the whole group, C was significantly related to height (r = -0.43; P less than 0.03). Neither C nor VO2max (with, in this case, the exception of the 3000 m athletes) were correlated to v. On the other hand, vamax was significantly correlated to v over distances longer than 800 m. These v were also correlated to vla4. However vla4 occurred at 87.5% SD 3.3% of vamax, this relationship was interpreted as being an expression of the correlation between vamax and v. Calculation of vamax provided a useful means of analysing the performances. At the level of achievement studied, v sustained over 3000 m corresponded to vamax.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

To investigate the different ways of assessing the running velocity at which maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) occurs, or maximal aerobic velocity (vamax), 32 well-trained runners (8 female and 24 male) were studied. The vamax and the running velocity corresponding to a blood lactate concentration of 4 mmol.l-1 (vla4) were measured during a progressive treadmill session. Within the week preceding or following the treadmill measurement the subjects completed a Université de Montreal Track-Test (UMTT). The velocity corresponding to the last stage of this test (vUMTT) was slightly higher than vamax: 6.08 m.s-1, SD 0.41, vs 6.01 m.s-1, SD 0.44 (P less than 0.03) but these two velocities were strongly correlated (r = 0.92, P less than 0.001). The heart rate values corresponding to these velocities were similar and well correlated (r = 0.79, P less than 0.01); the corresponding blood lactate values had similar mean values: 10.5 mmol.l-1, SD 2.7 vs 11.8 mmol.l-1, SD 2.5, but were not correlated. Both vamax and vUMTT correlated well with the best performance sustained over 1500 m during the season. These results suggest that the UMTT provides a value of vamax as accurately as a treadmill measurement and that either could be used to measure the running velocity corresponding to VO2max. The v1a4 was 86.6%, SD 2.6 of vamax; these two velocities correlated strongly. Thus, in well trained runners, v1a4, when measured with a well-defined procedure, corresponds to a constant fraction of vamax and depends then on VO2max and the energy cost of running.