The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenator instead of standard cardiopulmonary bypass during lung transplantation is debatable. Moreover, recently, the concept of prolonged postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) support has been introduced in many transplant centers to prevent primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and improve early and long-term results.The objective of this study was to review the results of our extracorporeal life support strategy during and after bilateral sequential lung transplantation (BSLT) for pulmonary artery hypertension. We review retrospectively our experience in BSLT A total of 38 patients were identified. Nine patients were transplanted using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), in eight cases CPB was followed by a prolonged ECMO (pECMO) support, 14 patients were transplanted on central ECMO support, and seven patients were transplanted with central ECMO support followed by a pECMO assistance. The effects of different support strategies were evaluated, in particular in-hospital morbidity, mortality, incidence of PGD, and long-term follow-up. The use of CPB was associated with poor postoperative results and worse long-term survival compared with ECMO-supported patients. Predictive preoperative factors for the need of intraoperative CPB instead of ECMO were identified. The pECMO strategy had a favorable effect to mitigate postoperative morbidity and mortality, not only in intraoperative ECMO-supported patients, but even in CPB-supported cases. In our experience, ECMO may be considered as the first choice circulatory support for lung transplantation. Sometimes, in very complex cases, CBP is still necessary. The pECMO strategy is very effective to reduce incidence of PGD even in CPB-supported patients. K E Y W O R D S cardiopulmonary bypass, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, extracorporeal support technique, lung transplantation, pulmonary hypertension 630 | DELL'AMORE Et AL. F I G U R E 1 Examples of clear indication for CPB instead of ECMO. A, extreme cardiomegaly. B, severe dilatation of the right and left pulmonary artery branches. C, severe aneurysm of the main pulmonary artery. D, over-systemic pulmonary artery hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure shown in yellow and systemic pressure shown in red) [Color figure can be viewed at wiley onlin elibr ary.com] F I G U R E 2 ECLS techniques. A, aorto-bicaval CPB cannulation. B, aorto-bicaval CPB cannulation with pulmonary artery vent (black arrow). C, central aorto-right atrium ECMO cannulation. D, prolonged ECMO setting with peripheral femoro-femoral cannulation with distal leg perfusion [Color figure can be viewed at wiley onlin elibr ary.com] How to cite this article: Dell'Amore A, Campisi A, Congiu S, et al. Extracorporeal life support during and after bilateral sequential lung transplantation in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension.
The results confirm that adequate removal of pulmonary artery obstructive lesions can also be achieved with an operative procedure that avoids or reduces the use of DHCA while allowing a bloodless field during PEA interventions. This technique may limit the well known adverse effects of DHCA due to organ hypoperfusion, improving the postoperative recovery of the patients.
The current surgical strategy for pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) involves the use of extracorporeal circulation and hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA). The aim of the present study was to test the feasibility of a different strategy of extracorporeal circulation, which could prevent bronchial back bleeding and allow a bloodless operating field, avoiding the risks associated with HCA in patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy. Between June 2004 and September 2005, eight patients underwent PEA without HCA. We introduced a double venting of the left heart sections, utilizing two cannulas placed in the left ventricle and atrium. Both vent cannulas are connected with vacuum device to prevent back-bleeding and left heart distension from the large amount of bronchial flow. We were able to perform pulmonary endarterectomy avoiding circulatory arrest and deep hypothermia without sacrificing the effectiveness of the procedure. The initial encouraging results have convinced us to apply systematically this technique in the cases operated in our center, even though further investigations are necessary to fully examine this technique.
Background: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the gold standard therapy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Traditionally, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) represents the main prognostic factor after surgery. The pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) has been proposed for the assessment of RV in advanced heart failure, but it has never been applied in CTEPH patients. The aim of the present study is to describe PAPi in patients who underwent PEA, before and after surgery, and to define its predictive impact on postoperative outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 188 consecutive adult patients who underwent PEA, between December 2003 and December 2021. PAPi was calculated for 186 patients and reported. Patients were partitioned in two groups using median preoperative PAPi as cutoff value: Group 1 with PAPi ≤ 8.6 (n = 94) and Group 2 with PAPi > 8.6 (n = 92). The propensity-score-matched analysis identified 67 pairs: Early outcomes were compared between two groups. Results: Mean preoperative PAPi was 10.3 ± 7.2. Considering matched populations, no differences emerged in terms of postoperative hemodynamics; Group 1 demonstrated higher 90-day mortality significance (10.4% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.082); the need for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was similar, but successful weaning was unlikely (25% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.032). Conclusions: Mean PAPi in the CTEPH population is higher than in other diseases. Low PAPi (≤8.6) seems to be associated with lower postoperative survival and successful weaning from MCS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.