We investigated the in vitro viscoelastic changes of progressive haemodilution with 4% albumin compared with normal saline (NS) using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®, Pentapharm Co., Munich, Germany). Whole blood samples obtained from 20 healthy volunteers were diluted in vitro with 4% albumin or NS by 10%, 20% and 40%. Fibrinogen concentration and ROTEM® (EXTEM [screening test for the extrinsic haemostasis system], FIBTEM [EXTEM-based assay for the fibrin part of the clot]) variables including coagulation time, clot formation time (CFT), α-angle, maximum clot firmness and lysis index were measured in the undiluted sample and at each degree of haemodilution. There was no significant difference in fibrinogen concentration at equivalent haemodilutions with normal saline and 4% albumin solutions. Forty percent haemodilution with albumin significantly prolonged coagulation time (EXTEM P=0.007, FIBTEM P=0.0001) and significantly decreased lysis index (FIBTEM P=0.009) compared with NS. A significant decrease in maximum clot firmness from undiluted measurements (P=0.05) was observed at lower haemodilutions with albumin (20% with EXTEM, 10% with FIBTEM) compared with NS (40% with EXTEM and FIBTEM). The adverse effects of large degrees of haemodilution with 4% albumin solution are in excess of what can be explained by haemodilution alone. This study suggests that large degrees of haemodilution with albumin impair fibrinogen activity to a greater extent than equivalent degrees of haemodilution with NS.

Over the past decade there has been an exponential increase in the number of robotic-assisted surgical procedures performed in Australia and internationally. Despite this growth, there are no level I or II studies examining the anaesthetic implications of these procedures. Available observational studies provide insight into the significant challenges for the anaesthetist. Most anaesthetic considerations overlap with those of non-robotic surgery. However, issues with limited patient access and extremes of positioning resulting in physiological disturbances and risk of injury are consistently demonstrated concerns specific to robotic-assisted procedures.