Background: The predominant emphysema phenotype is associated with more severe airflow limitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A study was undertaken to investigate whether COPD patients, with or without emphysema quantitatively confirmed by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), have different COPD severity as assessed by the BODE index (body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnoea, exercise performance) and inspiratory capacity to total lung capacity ratio (IC/TLC), and by different biological markers of lung parenchymal destruction. Methods: Twenty six outpatients with COPD and eight healthy non-smokers were examined. Each subject underwent HRCT scanning, pulmonary function tests, cell counts, and measurements of neutrophil elastase, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 in induced sputum, as well as measurement of desmosine, a marker of elastin degradation in urine, plasma and sputum. Results: Patients with HRCT confirmed emphysema had a higher BODE index and lower IC/TLC ratio than subjects without HRCT confirmed emphysema and controls. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ), FEV 1 /forced vital capacity ratio, and carbon monoxide transfer coefficient were lower, whereas the number of eosinophils, MMP-9, and the MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio in sputum were higher in patients with emphysema. In COPD patients the number of sputum eosinophils was the biological variable that correlated positively with the HRCT score of emphysema (p = 0.04). Conclusions: These results suggest that COPD associated with HRCT confirmed emphysema is characterised by more severe lung function impairment, more intense airway inflammation and, possibly, more serious systemic dysfunction than COPD not associated with HRCT confirmed emphysema.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in both industrialized and developing countries.Cigarette smoking is the major risk factor for COPD. However, relevant information from the literature published within the last years, either on general population samples or on workplaces, indicate that about 15% of all cases of COPD is work-related.Specific settings and agents are quoted which have been indicated or confirmed as linked to COPD. Coal miners, hard-rock miners, tunnel workers, concrete-manufacturing workers, nonmining industrial workers have been shown to be at highest risk for developing COPD.Further evidence that occupational agents are capable of inducing COPD comes from experimental studies, particularly in animal models.In conclusion, occupational exposure to dusts, chemicals, gases should be considered an established, or supported by good evidence, risk factor for developing COPD. The implications of this substantial occupational contribution to COPD must be considered in research planning, in public policy decision-making, and in clinical practice.
Background:The predominant emphysema phenotype is associated with more severe airflow limitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We investigated whether COPD patients with or without quantitatively HRCT scan-documented emphysema have different COPD severity, as assessed by BODE (body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, exercise performance) Index and inspiratory capacity-to-total lung capacity ratio (IC/TLC), and by different biological markers of lung parenchymal destruction. Methods: We examined 26 outpatients with COPD and 8 healthy nonsmokers. Each subject underwent HRCT scan, pulmonary function tests, cell counts and measurements of neutrophil elastase, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 in induced sputum, as well as measurement of desmosine, a marker of elastin degradation in urine, plasma and sputum. Results: As compared with subjects without HRCT documented emphysema and controls, patients with HRCT scan-documented emphysema had higher BODE Index and lower IC/TLC. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1 ), FEV 1 /forced vital capacity ratio, and carbon monoxide transfer coefficient were lower, whereas the number of eosinophils, MMP-9 and the MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio in sputum were higher in patients with emphysema. In COPD patients, the number of sputum eosinophils was the biological variable that correlated positively with the HRCT score of emphysema (p = 0.04). Conclusions:These results suggest that COPD associated with HRCT scan documented emphysema is characterized by more severe lung function impairment, more intense airway inflammation, and, possibly, more serious systemic dysfunctioning, as compared with COPD not associated with HRCT scan-documented emphysema.Word counts: 242 Key words: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, biological markers, outcomes. INTRODUCTIONChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by the progressive development of airflow limitation that is not fully reversible.[1] Chronic airflow limitation may be caused by increased resistance of the small conducting airways and increased compliance of the lung due to emphysema.[1] We have previously shown that COPD patients with HRCT-documented emphysema have more severe airflow limitation.[2] Now we hypothesize that COPD patients with emphysema, as quantitatively assessed by HRCT, may be associated with more severe disease and may be characterized by biological markers of lung parenchymal destruction, measurable by noninvasive methods. The BODE (body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, exercise performance) Index and the inspiratory capacity-to-total lung capacity ratio (IC/TLC) have been recently demonstrated to grade properly the severity of COPD, as a systemic and respiratory disease, and to predict the outcome in these patients. [3][4] The higher the BODE Index and the lower the IC/TLC ratio, the higher is the risk of death from any cause and respiratory causes in subjects with COPD. There have been...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with đź’™ for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.