The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a widely used health-related quality of life measure. However, little research has been conducted on its dimensionality. The objectives of the current study were to apply Rasch analysis to DLQI data to determine whether the scale is unidimensional, to assess its measurement properties, test the response format, and determine whether the measure exhibits differential item functioning (DIF) by disease (atopic dermatitis versus psoriasis), gender, or age group. The results show that there were several problems with the scale, including misfitting items, DIF by disease, age, and gender, disordered response thresholds, and inadequate measurement of patients with mild illness. As the DLQI did not benefit from the application of Rasch analysis in its development, it is argued that a new measure of disability related to dermatological disease is required. Such a measure should use a coherent measurement model and ensure that items are relevant to all potential respondents. The current use of the DLQI as a guide to treatment selection is of concern, given its inadequate measurement properties.

BackgroundIndividuals with precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) experience severely impaired quality of life. A disease-specific outcome measure for PH, the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) was developed and validated in the UK and subsequently adapted for use in additional countries. The aim of this study was to translate and assess the reliability and validity of the CAMPHOR for German-speaking populations.MethodsThree main adaptation stages involved; translation (employing bilingual and lay panels), cognitive debriefing interviews with patients and validation (assessment of the adaptation’s psychometric properties). The psychometric evaluation included 107 patients with precapillary PH (60 females; age mean (standard deviation) 60 (15) years) from 3 centres in Austria, Germany and Switzerland.ResultsNo major problems were found with the translation process with most items easily rendered into acceptable German. Participants in the cognitive debriefing interviews found the questionnaires relevant, comprehensive and easy to complete. Psychometric analyses showed that the adaptation was successful. The three CAMPHOR scales (symptoms, activity limitations and quality of life) had excellent test-retest reliability correlations (Symptoms = 0.91; Activity limitations = 0.91; QoL = 0.90) and internal consistency (Symptoms = 0.94; Activity limitations = 0.93; QoL = 0.94). Predicted correlations with the Nottingham Health Profile provided evidence of the construct validity of the CAMPHOR scales. The CAMPHOR adaptation also showed known group validity in its ability to distinguish between participants based on perceived general health, perceived disease severity, oxygen use and NYHA classification.ConclusionsThe CAMPHOR has been shown to be valid and reliable in the German population and is recommend for use in clinical practice.

Background: Patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) experience health-related quality of life (HRQoL) decrement due to symptoms such as fatigue, pain, and insomnia. Pt perspectives of their disease and treatment expectations can help inform clinical decision-making. The phase 1b/2 CARTITUDE-1 study (NCT03548207) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; JNJ-68284528; LCAR-B38M CAR-T cells), a chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy with 2 B-cell maturation antigen-targeting single-domain antibodies, in pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM. An exploratory objective is to describe pretreatment goals and expectations and post-treatment experience of cilta-cel using qualitative interviews. Methods: Pts (aged ≥18 years) with an MM diagnosis per International Myeloma Working Group criteria who had received ≥3 prior regimens or were double-refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug, and who had received an anti-CD38 antibody were included. On Day 1, cilta-cel (target dose 0.75×106 [range 0.5-1.0×106] CAR+ viable T cells/kg) was given as a single infusion 5-7 days after start of lymphodepletion (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 + fludarabine 30 mg/m2 daily for 3 days). In the phase 2 portion, pts had the option to participate in structured qualitative interviews conducted pretreatment, at Day 100 ± 30 (end of cilta-cel post-infusion period), and Day 184 ± 30 (during post-treatment phase). Pretreatmentinterviews: pts were asked open-ended questions about their experience living with MM and expectations of cilta-cel. Day 100and184interviews: pts were asked about changes to their MM symptoms and daily life impacts, experiences with cilta-cel, and if pretreatment expectations were met. Content analysis of qualitative data was performed by extracting themes from the transcripts based on a coding dictionary. Results: Of 68 pts in the phase 2 portion, 36 (55.6% male; median age: 62.5 years [range: 46-77]) completed ≥1 interview (pretreatment: n=27; Day 100: n=23; Day 184: n=24); 24 pts completed >1 interview and 14 completed all 3 interviews. The most common symptoms reported at the pretreatment interview, pain (85.2% of pts) and fatigue (74.1% of pts), were also frequently considered to have the greatest impact on pts' lives (29.6% and 25.9%, respectively) and identified as symptoms that pts would most like to see improved (25.9% and 33.3%, respectively). After cilta-cel therapy, at Day 100 and 184 interviews, respectively, the proportions of pts who reported pain (21.7% and 29.2%) and fatigue (34.8% and 20.8%) decreased. At the pretreatment interview, pts most frequently reported that MM impacted relationships (92.6%), psychological and emotional functioning (88.9%), and activities of daily living (66.7%). In longitudinal analyses of pts who completed >1 interview, most pts reported either improvement or no change in these impacts at Day 100 and 184 interviews, respectively, (relationships [50.0% and 58.3%], psychological and emotional functioning [77.3% and 83.3%], and activities of daily living [59.1% and 62.5%]), suggesting a diminished impact of MM on HRQoL following cilta-cel treatment. The most common expectations of cilta-cel reported by pts at the pretreatment interview were remission (40.7%), extended life expectancy (14.8%), less treatment (11.1%), and cure (11.1%). The most frequently reported treatment hopes were remission (40.7%), return to perceived normalcy (25.9%), cure (25.9%), and extended life expectancy (22.2%). Key areas in which pts would consider changes to be meaningful with cilta-cel treatment were improved MM symptoms (70.4%), return to perceived normalcy (40.7%), and the ability to be more physically active (33.3%). At Day 100 and 184 interviews, respectively, 78.3% and 91.7% of pts reported that their expectations of cilta-cel were met or exceeded (Figure A). Furthermore, most pts at the Day 100 and 184 interviews (52.2% and 70.8%, respectively) perceived their experience with cilta-cel as exclusively better than their previous treatment experiences (Figure B). Conclusions: Pts treated with cilta-cel experienced reductions in both symptoms associated with R/R MM and impact of MM on HRQoL. Pretreatment expectations of cilta-cel were met or exceeded, and most pts reported their experience was better than with prior MM treatments. Disclosures Cohen: Novartis: Other: Patents/Intellectual property licensed, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech/Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hari:GSK: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Htut:City of Hope Medical Center: Current Employment. Berdeja:CURIS: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vivolux: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Kesios: Research Funding; EMD Sorono: Research Funding; Glenmark: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Legend: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellularity: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Bluebird: Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy. Madduri:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; Legend: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Foundation Medicine: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kinevant: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaking Engagement, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Usmani:Celgene: Other; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; BMS, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; SkylineDX: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Speaking Fees, Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Research Funding. Allred:Janssen: Current Employment. Olyslager:Janssen: Current Employment. Banerjee:Janssen: Current Employment. Goldberg:Johnson & Johnson: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Schecter:Janssen: Current Employment. Jackson:Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Consultancy; Janssen: Current Employment. Gries:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fastenau:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Deraedt:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Carrasco:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Akram:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Hossain:Legend Biotech USA Inc.: Current Employment. Crawford:RTI Health Solutions: Current Employment. Morrison:RTI Health Solutions: Current Employment. Doward:RTI Health Solutions: Current Employment. Jakubowiak:AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive, Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jagannath:BMS, Janssen, Karyopharm, Legend Biotech, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy.

5049 Introduction: Little research is currently available on the impact of MDS from the patients' perspective. Where research has been conducted it has predominantly used generic cancer outcome measures. Such measures do not provide an accurate assessment of MDS patients as they miss important aspects of the condition. A qualitative study was conducted with MDS patients to investigate how their lives are affected by the condition. Methods: Qualitative, unstructured interviews were conducted with patients. Verbatim transcripts of the interviews were analysed thematically to assess the impact of MDS in terms of symptoms experienced, activity limitations and quality of life (QoL). Emergent themes were identified, clustered and harmonised. Investigation of issues related to impairments and activity limitations were guided by the World Health Organizations (WHO) classification of outcomes related to health and injury. Investigation of QoL issues was guided by the needs-based model of QoL (Hunt SM, McKenna SP. The QLDS: A scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression. (1992). Health Policy 22; 307–319). This model identifies several core fundamental needs that are important to an individual's QoL and adjustment to society. Illness affects QoL by preventing the satisfaction of these needs. Results: The sample included 30 participants (male 17 (56.7%); mean (SD) age 65.5 (11.3) years with low to intermediate-1 risk MDS. Illness information for the sample is shown in Table 1. The analyses identified several symptoms. The most frequently reported symptoms were; fatigue (97%), breathlessness (60%), increased infections (60%), sleep problems (53%), cognitive problems (50%), temperature fluctuations (47%), increased bruising (40%) and bleeding (10%), pain (30%), depression (23%) and anxiety (10%). Several common functions were affected by MDS, including; standing, walking, bending, lifting, carrying and rising from sitting. Various more complex functions were also affected such as the ability to socialise, shop and do jobs around the house. A total 33 QoL issues were identified. Nine fundamental needs were affected by MDS; subsistence, safety and security, affection, understanding, participation, leisure, self-actualisation, identity and independence. Conclusions: The study was successful in developing outcome models describing how MDS affects symptoms, activity limitations and QoL. Many symptoms were experienced including several in addition to those directly associated with anaemia. Functioning was also frequently affected. A wide range of QoL issues were identified with several fundamental needs impaired to some extent. Following this study a large bank of potential items has been created that will aid the development of MDS-specific outcome scales assessing symptoms, activity limitations and QoL. Disclosures: McKenna: Celgene Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding. Twiss:Celgege Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wilburn:Celegene Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding. Crawford:Celegene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Loth:Celgene Ltd: Employment.

No abstract