The growth and decay of nitrifying organisms determines the amount of nitrifying bacteria in activated sludge systems. The growth rate of the nitrifying organisms is reasonable, well defined, and studied, while the decay rate is still rather uncertain. Experiments in previous studies were over periods up to 14 days and obtained results were not confirmed. Contradicting decay rates of nitrifiers in different bacterial communities is reported. No differentiation between ammonia and nitrite oxidizers was made. Therefore, in this studyper day the decay rate of the nitrifying organisms was studied. The starvation condition (aerobic, anoxic, or anaerobic), temperature, type of bacterial community, and the presence of higher organisms are the main aspects that were investigated. A simple and reliable method (adapted from previous studies) for determining the decay rate of nitrifying organisms under different starvation conditions and different temperatures was developed. The test procedure has been used for determining the decay rate of ammonium and nitrite oxidizing bacteria in an enriched nitrifying culture and in activated sludge. The test was successfully applied at starvation periods up to 30 days. The decay rate of the enriched culture of nitrifiers was very low compared to values for nitrifiers in activated sludge. The decay rate of the nitrifiers in activated sludge was found to be to 0.2, 0.1, and 0.06 per day for aerobic, anoxic, and anaerobic conditions, respectively. The decay rate of ammonia oxidizers and nitrite oxidizers was the same at the corresponding conditions.

Nitrogen removal in side stream processes offers a good potential for upgrading wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) that need to meet stricter effluent standards. Removing nutrients from these internal process flows significantly reduces the N-load to the main treatment plant. These internal flows mainly result from the sludge processing and have a high temperature and a high concentration of ammonia. Therefore, the required reactor volumes as well as the required aerobic SRT are small. Generally, biological treatment processes are more economical and preferred over physical–chemical processes. Recently, several biological treatment processes have been introduced for sludge water treatment. These processes are available now on the activated sludge market (e.g. SHARON®, ANAMMOX® and BABE® processes). The technologies differ in concept and in the limitations guiding the application of these processes for upgrading WWTPs. This paper reviews and compares different biological alternatives for nitrogen removal in side streams. The limitations for selecting a technology from the available ones in the activated sludge market are noted and analysed. It is stressed that the choice for a certain process is based on more aspects than pure process engineering arguments.

No abstract

Mathematical modelling is considered a time and cost-saving tool for evaluation of new wastewater treatment concepts. Modelling can help to bridge the gap between lab and full-scale application. Bio-augmentation can be used to obtain nitrification in activated sludge systems with a limited aerobic sludge retention time. In the present study the potential for augmenting the endogenous nitrifying population is evaluated. Implementing a nitrification reactor in the sludge return line fed with sludge liquor with a high ammonia concentration leads to augmentation of the native nitrifying population. Since the behaviour of nitrifiers is relatively well known, a choice was made to evaluate this new concept mainly based on mathematical modelling. As an example an existing treatment plant (WWTP Walcheren, The Netherlands) that needed to be upgraded was used. A mathematical model, based on the TUDP model and implemented in AQUASIM was developed and used to evaluate the potential of this bioaugmentation in the return sludge line. A comparison was made between bio-augmentation and extending the existing aeration basins and anoxic tanks. The results of both modified systems were compared to give a quantitative basis for evaluation of benefits gained from such a system. If the plant is upgraded by conventional extension it needs an increase in volume of about 225%; using a bioaugmentation in the return sludge line the total volume of the tanks needs to be expanded by only 75% (including the side stream tanks). Based on the modelling results a decision was made to implement the bioaugmentation concept at full scale without further pilot scale testing, thereby strongly decreasing the scale-up period for this process.