Purpose: To evaluate a possible influence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide autoantibodies (ACPA) -positive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on visual field (VF) testing in patients with arterial hypertension (aHT). Methods: We conducted an observational cross-sectional study comparing patients with ACPA-positive RA and aHT, patients with aHT and healthy subjects. Further inclusion criteria were visual acuity (VA) of 0.8 or better and age between 40 and 60 years. VF testing was performed with standard automated achromatic perimetry (SAP), short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) (Octopus 300 \reg ) and flicker perimetry (Pulsar \reg ). Results were analysed for a possible correlation with blood pressure or RA-activity. Results: Twenty subjects with RA and aHT, 26 patients with aHT and 22 healthy participants were examined. Significant differences were found for mean sensitivity (MS) in SWAP comparing RA-patients with healthy participants (DMS À3.06, p = 0.001) and with hypertensive patients (DMS À2.32, p = 0.007). In SAP we observed a significant difference between patients with RA and healthy subjects regarding loss variance (LV) (DLV = +9.77, p = 0.004). Flicker perimetry did not demonstrate significant differences between groups. A correlation of VF changes with blood pressure level or RA-activity was not observed. Conclusion: Patients with ACPA-positive RA and aHT showed significant impairment of VF performance in SWAP compared to patients with aHT alone and healthy subjects. SAP also revealed a significant difference of LV between RApatients and healthy subjects. aHT does not seem to induce functional changes in VF testing alone.
Contrary to our study hypothesis no structural and morphological changes could be detected in patients with arterial hypertension without RA compared to healthy subjects. Furthermore, no RA-specific effects could be shown in comparison with the hypertension group. Thus, the used examination techniques are not suitable to prove the systemic inflammatory influence of RA on the eye.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.