Objective: to identify irreversible organ damages and factors influencing their development and to compare existing musculoskeletal injuries with the activity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Patients and methods. The investigation enrolled 197 peri- and postmenopausal female outpatients (mean age, 50.94±9.1 years) with SLE, who were followed up at Clinical Rheumatology Hospital Twenty-Five, Saint Petersburg. The mean disease duration was 9.7±7.5 years. Cytostatic and glucocorticoid (GC) treatment regimens and dosages in the examinees were analyzed on the basis of their primary medical records. The investigators assessed the current disease activity by the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI-2K) and the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and irreversible organ damages by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Damage Index (DI).Results and discussion. 93.4% of the patients continued to receive GS therapy at the time of inclusion in the study. The median GS maintenance dose was 12.5 mg/day. Almost half of the patients (n=86/43.7%) were in menopause (its mean duration was 12.8±7.1 years). Half of the examinees were noted to have remission (n=36/18.3%) or low SLE activity (n=92/46.7%) according to the SLEDAI-2K. Fifty-seven (28.9%) patients met all 5 LLDAS criteria; at the same time other 96 (48.7%) patients met 4 out of the 5 criteria, the 5th criterion being a high GC maintenance dose. High DI scores of ≥4 were found in two thirds (n=131/66.5%) of the examinees. Musculoskeletal system injuries ranked first among other disorders: osteoporosis (OP) and muscle weakness were detected in 76 (38.6%) and 69 (35.0%) patients, respectively. Regression analysis involving all statistically significant factors showed that the degree of damage was influenced by age (p=0.013215), total GS dose (p=0.000047), and previous therapy with cyclophosphamide (p=0.041505).Conclusion. The contribution of GS therapy to irreversible damage accrual is obvious in peri- and postmenopausal women with SLE. Timely dose adjustment or complete withdrawal of GS during remission in SLE is one of the key factors that substantially reduce the risk of progression of irreversible organ damages due to the prevention of OP and osteoporotic fractures in these patients.
ObjectivesTo investigate the influence of asymptomatic vertebral fractures on organ damage and to identify risk factors associated with critical organ damage in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods197 women with SLE were included in this study. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the hip and spine were performed using the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) was done for detection vertebral fractures using a method described by Genant. Accumulated damage was scored using the SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI). Critical organ damage was defined as SDI>3.ResultsVertebral fractures were developed in 55 (27.9%) women with SLE. Half of all women with SLE (n=31, 15.7%) had asymptomatic vertebral fractures which were diagnosed for the first time in this study. 131 (66.5%) women with SLE had critical organ damage (SDI>3). Average SDI before and after morphometry was 4,4±2,2 and 5,3±2,6 respectively. Multivariate analysis showed age (p=0,01), cumulative dose of glucocorticoids (p=0,00005), previous therapy with cyclophosphamide (p=0,04) were significantly associated with critical damage in women with SLE.ConclusionsDetection of vertebral fractures helps in counting accumulated organ damage correctly. VFA in the combination with DXA in women with SLE is an effective method for diagnostic asymptomatic vertebral fractures.Disclosure of InterestNone declared
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.