In some regions dependent on groundwater, such as the lower south-east of South Australia in the Green Triangle, deep-rooted, woody vegetation might have undesirable hydrological impacts by competing for finite, good-quality groundwater resources. In other regions, such as the Riverina in south-central New South Wales, where rising watertables and associated salinisation is threatening the viability of agriculture, woody vegetation might have beneficial hydrological impacts. In response to a growing need to better understand the impacts of tree plantations on groundwater, annual evapotranspiration and transpiration were measured at 21 plantation sites in the Green Triangle and the Riverina. Sources of tree water uptake from rainfall and groundwater were determined by measurements of evapotranspiration and soil water over periods of 2–5 years. In the Green Triangle, under a combination of permeable soil over groundwater of low salinity (<2000 mg L–1) at 6-m depth or less, in a highly transmissive aquifer, annual evapotranspiration at eight research sites in Pinus radiata D.Don and Eucalyptus globulus Labill. plantations averaged 1090 mm year–1 (range 847–1343 mm year–1), compared with mean annual precipitation of 630 mm year–1. These plantation sites used groundwater at a mean annual rate of 435 mm year–1 (range 108–670 mm year–1). At eight other plantation sites that had greater depth to the watertable or a root-impeding layer, annual evapotranspiration was equal to, or slightly less than, annual rainfall (mean 623 mm year–1, range 540–795 mm year–1). In the Riverina, where groundwater was always present within 3 m of the surface, Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden trees at three sites with medium or heavy clay, alkaline, sodic, saline subsoils used little or no groundwater, whereas E. grandis and Corymbia maculata (Hook.) K.D.Hill and L.A.S.Johnson trees at a site with a neutral sandy soil and groundwater of low salinity used 380 and 730 mm year–1 of groundwater (respectively 41 and 53% of total annual evapotranspiration). We conclude that commonly grown Eucalyptus species and P. radiata are able to use groundwater under a combination of light- or medium-textured soil and shallow depth to a low-salinity watertable.

No abstract

We studied the growth and water balance of young plantations of Pinus radiata D. Don and Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden irrigated with effluent for 3 years in a climate of high net evaporation. The plantations were irrigated weekly with secondary-treated municipal effluent at the estimated water-use rate, or at nominally twice or half this rate. Control plots were irrigated with bore water at their estimated water-use rate. Both species grew rapidly when irrigated with either effluent or bore water. The eucalypts irrigated with effluent at the estimated water-use rate closed canopy in 24 months, and at 34 months, mean dominant height was 12.1 m, stand basal area was 12.2 m(2) ha(-1), volume was 51.2 m(3) ha(-1), LAI was 5.7, and foliage mass was 6.5 Mg ha(-1). The pines in the corresponding effluent treatment had not closed canopy by 34 months. At this time, mean height was 5.0 m, stand basal area was 9.6 m(2) ha(-1), volume was 29.7 m(3) ha(-1), LAI was 3.5, and foliage mass was 7.3 Mg ha(-1). Water use by eucalypts was consistently higher than by pines, commensurate with their more rapid early growth, but the difference was not in proportion to the difference in leaf area. In the third year (when the eucalypts had a closed canopy), the eucalypts used 22% more water than the pines, but the annual mean LAI of the eucalypts was three times greater than that of the pines. The results suggest that (1) plantation water use by the two species on the same site will be similar for the same stage of canopy development, (2) eucalypts are not inherently more profligate consumers of water than pines when soil water is not limiting, and (3) stomatal control limits growth and water use of E. grandis in arid environments.

No abstract