To evaluate the utility of different scales for clinical assessment, over time, in acute bacterial meningitis, the authors investigated 53 consecutive patients (mean age 53 +/- 17 years). Clinical status on days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 14 after admission was determined by the Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and Hunt and Hess Scale (HH), and, on day 21, by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Transcranial Doppler examinations were performed serially to assess for disease-related arterial narrowing. This was observed in 27 patients (51%) within 2 weeks of admission. All scales were observed to correlate with the 21-day GOS. Patients with cerebral arterial narrowing had significantly decreased SSS scores between days 1 and 8 and worse GCS and HH scores between days 3 and 5. Mean blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery on days 5 and 8 significantly correlated with GOS (r = 0.268, P < .008; r = -0.324, P < .003, respectively). The use of such clinical scales allows standardized assessment of patients with bacterial meningitis and provides prognostic information. Cerebral arterial narrowing was observed to correlate with neurologic impairment.

The predictive usefulness of clinical scores in patients with acute bacterial meningitis was investigated. Fifty-one consecutive patients with acute bacterial meningitis were scored on days 1, 3, 5, 8, and 14 after admission according to the Sandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS), Glasgow Coma-Scale (GCS) and Hunt & Hess Scale (HH). As an index of their usefulness to predict the outcome, the scales were correlated with short-term outcome on day 21 assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). The scores of all three scales correlated highly significantly with short-term outcome. Depending on the day of assessment, Spearman correlation coefficients ranged between 0.52 and 0.88 for SSS, between 0.50 and 0.84 for GCS, and between -0.47 and -0.82 for HH. The scales differed in their ability to predict outcome on and after day 1: mortality was best predicted by GCS, and complete recovery was best predicted by SSS. The use of scales in bacterial meningitis provides a rational quantitative basis to predict outcome more graduated than in dead or alive. Because the scales accentuate different aspects of outcome (e.g. mortality, restitution), the selection of a scale to be used in clinical trials should take into consideration the main focus of the study.

No abstract