Glucocorticoids (GCs) are known inhibitors of wound healing. In this study we report the novel finding that both keratinocytes in vitro and epidermis in vivo synthesize cortisol and how this synthesis regulates wound healing. We show that epidermis expresses enzymes essential for cortisol synthesis, including steroid 11 ␤-hydroxylase (CYP11B1), and an enzyme that controls negative feedback mechanism, 11␤-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2 (11␤HSD2). We also found that cortisol synthesis in keratinocytes and skin can be stimulated by ACTH and inhibited by metyrapone (CYP11B1 enzyme inhibitor). Interestingly, IL-1␤, the first epidermal signal of tissue injury, induces the expression of CYP11B1 and increases cortisol production by keratinocytes. Additionally, we found induction of CYP11B1 increased production of cortisol and activation of GR pathway during wound healing ex vivo and in vivo using human and porcine wound models, respectively. Conversely, inhibition of cortisol synthesis during wound healing increases IL-1␤ production, suggesting that cortisol synthesis in epidermis may serve as a local negative feedback to proinflammatory cytokines. Local GCs synthesis, therefore, may provide control of the initial proinflammatory response, preventing excessive inflammation upon tissue injury. Inhibition of GC synthesis accelerated wound closure in vivo, providing the evidence that modulation of cortisol synthesis in epidermis may be an important regulatory mechanism during wound healing.Acute wound healing is a complex biological process mediated by a network of signaling pathways that coordinate multiple cellular processes, including cellular migration and proliferation, ultimately leading to barrier restoration (1). Wound healing is a tightly spatiotemporally regulated process, and changes in any component of this process can be detrimental, leading to further tissue damage or impairment of healing (2, 3).For example, timing of inflammatory response is essential; proinflammatory signals are important in the early stage of healing, but they can be detrimental if they persist (4, 5), underscoring a need for tight control of both stimulators and inhibitors during the wound healing process.Upon injury, keratinocytes are the first cells that respond (6, 7) by releasing pre-stored interleukin-1 (IL-1) (8). IL-1 has an autocrine and a paracrine function; that is, to activate keratinocytes and to alert the surrounding cells and tissues. The release of IL-1 by keratinocytes, with subsequent release of additional signaling molecules (9, 10), demarcates the proinflammatory phase of wound healing. In response to these signals, activated keratinocytes start migrating and proliferating (7,8,11). Successful repair after tissue injury requires resolution of inflammatory response, transitioning keratinocyte (HEK) from activated to differentiating phenotype. However, very little is known about endogenous epidermal signals that control keratinocyte activation cycle and inflammatory response.Epidermal keratinocytes have important immunol...

Glucocorticoids (GCs) have a long history of use as therapeutic agents for numerous skin diseases. Surprisingly, their specific molecular effects are largely unknown. To characterize GC action in epidermis, we compared the transcriptional profiles of primary human keratinocytes untreated and treated with dexamethasone (DEX) for 1, 4, 24, 48, and 72 h using large scale microarray analyses. The majority of genes were found to be regulated only after 24 h and remained regulated throughout treatment. In addition to regulation of the expected pro-inflammatory genes, we found that GCs regulate cell fate, tissue remodeling, cell motility, differentiation, and metabolism. GCs suppress the expression of essentially all IFN␥-regulated genes, including IFN␥ receptor and STAT-1, an effect that was previously unknown. GCs also block STAT-1 activation and nuclear translocation. Unexpectedly, GCs induce the expression of anti-apoptotic genes and repress pro-apoptotic ones, preventing UVinduced keratinocyte apoptosis. Consequently, treatment with GCs blocked UV-induced apoptosis of keratinocytes. GCs have profound effect on wound healing by inhibiting cell motility and the expression of the proangiogenic factor, vascular endothelial growth factor. They play an important role in tissue remodeling and scar formation by suppressing the expression of TGF␤1 and -2 and MMP1, -2, -9, and -10 and inducing TIMP-2. Finally, GCs promote terminal epidermal differentiation while simultaneously inhibiting early stage differentiation. These results provide new insights into the beneficial and adverse effects of GCs in the epidermis, defining the participating genes and mechanisms that coordinate the cellular responses important for GC-based therapies.

Epidermal morphology of chronic wounds differs from that of normal epidermis. Biopsies of non-healing edges obtained from patients with venous ulcers show thick and hyperproliferative epidermis with mitosis present in suprabasal layers. This epidermis is also hyper-keratotic and parakeratotic. This suggests incomplete activation and differentiation of keratinocytes. To identify molecular changes that lead to pathogenic alterations in keratinocyte activation and differentiation pathways we isolated mRNA from non-healing edges deriving from venous ulcers patients and determined transcriptional profiles using Affymetrix chips. Obtained transcriptional profiles were compared to those from healthy, unwounded skin. As previously indicated by histology, we found deregulation of differentiation and activation markers. We also found differential regulation of signalling molecules that regulate these two processes. Early differentiation markers, keratins K1/K10 and a subset of small proline-rich proteins, along with the late differentiation marker filaggrin were suppressed, whereas late differentiation markers involucrin, transgultaminase 1 and another subset of small proline-rich proteins were induced in ulcers when compared to healthy skin. Surprisingly, desomosomal and tight junction components were also deregulated. Keratinocyte activation markers keratins K6/K16/K17 were induced. We conclude that keratinocytes at the non-healing edges of venous ulcers do not execute either activation or differentiation pathway, resulting in thick callus-like formation at the edge of a venous ulcers.

Background Severe coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) is characterized by a pro‐inflammatory state with high mortality. Statins have anti‐inflammatory effects and may attenuate the severity of COVID‐19. Methods and Results An observational study of all consecutive adult patients with COVID‐19 from March 1, 2020 to May 2, 2020 admitted to a single‐center located in Bronx, New York. Patients were grouped as those that did and did not receive a statin and in‐hospital mortality was compared by competing events regression. In addition, propensity score matching and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) were used in survival models to examine the association between statin use and death during hospitalization. A total of 4,252 patients were admitted with COVID‐19. Diabetes modified the association between statin use and in‐hospital mortality. Patient with diabetes on a statin (n=983) were older (69±11 vs. 67±14 years, p<0.01), had lower inflammatory markers (C‐reactive protein: 10.2, IQR: 4.5‐18.4 vs. 12.9, IQR: 5.9‐21.4 mg/dl, p<0.01) and reduced cumulative in‐hospital mortality (24% vs. 39%, p<0.01) than those not on a statin (n=1,283). No difference in hospital mortality was noted in patients without diabetes on or off statin (20% vs. 21%, p=0.82). Propensity score matching (HR=0.88, 95% CI 0.83‐0.94, p<0.01) and IPTW (HR=0.88, 95% CI 0.8 4 ‐0.92, p<0.01) showed a 12% lower risk of death during hospitalization for statin users than non‐users. Conclusions Statin use was associated with reduced in‐hospital mortality from COVID‐19 in patients with diabetes. These findings, if validated, may further reemphasize administration of statins to patients with diabetes during the COVID‐19 era.