Male Wistar rats were subjected to colonic resection and randomized to one of four groups: control group (intraperitoneal NaCl, intravenous NaCl); 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) group (intraperitoneal 5-FU, intravenous NaCl); folinic acid group (intraperitoneal NaCl, intravenous folinic acid); and 5-FU-folinic acid group (intraperitoneal 5-FU, intravenous folinic acid). Treatment was started immediately after surgery and continued until the animals were killed at 3 or 7 days. Anastomotic complications (abscesses or dehiscence) occurred in four of 33 animals in the control group, 12 of 36 in the 5-FU group, one of 32 in the folinic acid group and nine of 36 in the 5-FU-folinic acid group. Anastomotic and skin breaking strength did not differ between groups on day 3 but by day 7 were significantly reduced in the 5-FU group. In rats given 5-FU-folinic acid, breaking strength was also reduced, but less so than in the 5-FU group. Breaking strength in animals receiving folinic acid was similar to that in the control group. In this model colonic healing was impaired after intraperitoneal 5-FU administration, but when folinic acid was added no further deterioration occurred.
In an experimental study resembling clinical use of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment of colorectal carcinoma, 97 male Wistar rats were operated on with a standardized left colonic resection. Treatment was given as a daily intraperitoneal injection. The animals were randomized to one of four groups: early treatment with 5-FU 20 mg/kg or saline 0.1 mol/l from the day of operation to day 7 after operation, and delayed treatment with 5-FU 20 mg/kg or saline 0.1 mol/l from the third day after operation to the day before killing. The animals were killed in groups on day 7 or 10 after operation. In the group receiving early 5-FU treatment there was an increased rate of anastomotic complications (seven of 26) compared with none in the control or delayed 5-FU groups. The anastomotic breaking strength in animals having early 5-FU treatment (day 7, median 1.45 (range 0.20-2.95) N; day 10, median 1.80 (range 0.95-3.20) N) was significantly lower than that in controls on both day 7 (median 3.20 (range 2.50-3.80)N) and day 10 (median 3.20 (range 2.20-3.60)N). In the delayed 5-FU treatment group anastomotic breaking strength did not differ from that in controls. Colonic healing was not impaired when intraperitoneal 5-FU treatment was started on day 3 after operation, whereas immediate postoperative administration of 5-FU had a detrimental effect on wound healing.
In an experimental study resembling clinical use of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment of colorectal carcinoma 86 male Wistar rats were operated with a standardized left colon resection and anastomosis with interrupted sutures. Treatment was given as daily intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections. The animals were randomized to one of two groups: (A) 5-FU (20 mg/kg) i.p., and (B) NaCl i.p. from the day of operation to sacrifice. Anastomotic complications were registered. In experiment 1 animals were randomized within treatment groups to be tested for anastomotic breaking strength with or without sutures in place when sacrificed 7 days postoperatively. In experiment 2 collagen synthesis was studied by an in vivo incorporation and hydroxylation of 3H-proline in the anastomotic segment during 24 h prior to sacrifice. The animals were sacrificed in groups on the third or seventh postoperative day. A higher number of anastomotic complications was registered when 5-FU was given. The anastomotic breaking strength was only 40% of controls both when tested with and without sutures. A reduced radioactivity of 3H-hydroxyproline in the anastomotic segment after 7 days of 5-FU treatment was found implying a reduction in collagen synthesis. In our model colonic healing was impaired after i.p. 5-FU treatment and this could be attributed to a reduced collagen synthesis in the wound gap as well as in the adjacent tissue responsible for the suture-holding capacity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.