what is known already: Vitrification has been successfully used for cryopreserving human oocytes and blastocyst-stage embryos. Most published studies looking at the neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified embryos refer to blastocyst-stage embryos. Information on children born after transfer of Day 3 vitrified embryos is relatively rare. study design, size, duration: A retrospective, single-centre study of children born after Day 3 embryo transfer from fresh, slow frozen or vitrified embryos during the period January 2006 to May 2011 was conducted. Each patient contributed only one cycle per group. Children born were followed-up at 7-30 days after delivery. Outcome measures include obstetric and neonatal outcomes, which were evaluated by medical records and questionnaires sent to parents. main results and the role of chance: Frequencies of hypertensive disorder, gestational diabetes, placenta previa and abruptio placenta were similar in all groups. Five hundred and forty five, 986 and 1914 singleton babies were born from vitrified, slow freezing and fresh transfers, and the median gestational ages were 38.7, 38.7 and 38.7 weeks, respectively. Preterm birth (32 -37 weeks) occurred in 7.5, 9.2 and 7.8% of the vitrified, slow freeze and fresh groups, respectively. The median birthweight from vitrified embryos (3455.3 g) was higher than that from slow freezing (3352.3 g) and fresh (3355.8 g) transfers (P , 0.0001 for both). The rate of perinatal mortality was 0.4% for all transfer groups. Three hundred and eighty two, 734 and 1322 twin babies were born from vitrified, slow freezing and fresh transfers, respectively. There were no differences among groups in mean gestational age and in the rate of preterm birth. The median birthweight for babies born from vitrified embryos (2587.4 g) was higher than that from the slow freezing (2538.8 g) or fresh (2494.4 g) transfer groups (vitrified versus fresh: P ¼ 0.0015; vitrified versus slow freeze: P ¼ 0.049). The rate of low birthweight (1500-2500 g) from vitrified (30.4%) was lower than that from fresh (36.2%) transfer (P ¼ 0.034).limitations, reasons for caution: The main limitation of this study is that the obstetric and neonatal data were obtained by questionnaires sent to the parents without checking medical records. This is, especially, problematic for reporting on congenital malformations, so birth defects were excluded from the data.wider implications of the findings: Transfer of vitrified and warmed Day 3 embryos does not seem to have an adverse effect on neonatal outcome. Children born following the transfer of vitrified embryos seem to have a higher birthweight when compared with those of fresh or slow frozen embryos. study funding/competing interest(s): This study received no outside funding and none of the authors has any conflict of interest.
In embryonic stem (ES) cells, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)/STAT3, wnt and nodal/activin signaling are mainly active to control pluripotency during expansion. To maintain pluripotency, ES cells are typically cultured on feeder cells of varying origins. Murine ES cells are commonly cultured on murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), which senesce early and must be frequently prepared. This process is laborious and leads to batch variation presenting a challenge for high-throughput ES cell expansion. Although some cell lines can be sustained by exogenous LIF, this method is costly. We present here a novel and inexpensive culture method for expanding murine ES cells on human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) feeders. After 20 passages on HFFs without LIF, ES cell lines showed normal expression levels of pluripotency markers, maintained a normal karyotype and retained the ability to contribute to the germline. As HFFs do not senesce for at least 62 passages, they present a vast supply of feeders.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.