Aim: Although insulin resistance (IR) is a growing trait among type 1 diabetes (T1D) population, its relationship with atherosclerosis has been scarcely studied. We assessed the association between IR indexes and carotid atherosclerosis in T1D, a population at high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 191 participants with T1D and no prior CVD with at least one of the following criteria: ≥40 years old; diabetic nephropathy; or T1D duration ≥10 years harbouring ≥1 additional CVD risk factor. IR was assessed with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) harmonized definition proposed in 2009 and the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), a T1D-specific IR surrogate marker (lower values indicating higher IR). Standardized carotid ultrasonography was performed, recording intima-media thickness (IMT), plaque presence and maximum height of plaque. Comparisons between patients according to their MetS status as well as concerning eGDR values were performed. Results: The participants' median age was 47.4 (41.1-53.3) years and diabetes duration 25.7 (21.6-32.5) years. Plaque prevalence was higher in patients with greater IR (49.1%, 29.1% and 20%, P = .001, for any plaque according to decreasing eGDR tertiles). Conversely, no statistically significant higher plaque prevalence was found in participants with MetS. In multivariate analyses (adjusted for general-and T1Dspecific risk factors, and statin treatment), MetS was associated with neither IMT nor plaque. On the contrary, eGDR was independently related to ≥2 plaques (P = .018) and maximum plaque height (P < .01). Conclusions: In T1D, IR assessed through eGDR but not by MetS definition was independently associated with plaque burden, a predictor of CVD.
revised the article critically. E.H. revised the article critically. M.M. revised the article critically. C.F. revised the article critically. F.D. analyzed and interpreted the data and revised the article critically. P.V.-A. collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data and prepared the article. Statistical analysis was performed by P.V.-A. with E.M.-M.
Background and aims: Tools to detect type 1 diabetes (T1D) individuals at overt cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are scarce. We aimed to assess the usefulness of the score 'Steno Type 1 Risk Engine' (Steno-Risk) to identify T1D patients with advanced carotid atherosclerosis. Material and methods: T1D patients without CVD with at least one of the following were included: ≥40 years, diabetic nephropathy, or diabetes duration ≥10 years with ≥1 CVD risk factor. Intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaque presence (IMT ≥1.5 mm) were assessed by standardized B-mode ultrasonography. Steno-Risk was used to estimate 10-year risk (<10% low; 10%-20% moderate; ≥20% high risk). Associations between Steno-Risk and preclinical atherosclerosis were assessed after adjusting for other CVD risk factors. Results: We evaluated 302 patients (55% men, age 47.8 ± 9.8 years, T1D duration 26.3 ± 9.3 years). The prevalence of carotid plaque and ≥2 plaques were 36.4% and 19.2%, respectively; without sex differences. Age (57.4 ± 7.4 vs 37.1 ± 6.2 years), T1D duration (31.3 ± 10.4 vs 21.5 ± 7.1 years), hypertension (52.3% vs 6.3%), nephropathy (25.6% vs 5.1%) and retinopathy (53.5% vs 32.9%) were higher in high-risk (n = 86) vs low-risk participants (n = 79; P < .001 for all). Preclinical atherosclerosis (IMT and plaque) increased in parallel with Steno-Risk (P < .001). In logistic regression analysis, both age ≥40 years and Steno-Risk ≥20% were associated with the presence of plaque (OR 4.22 [1.57-11.36] and 3.79 [1.61-6.80]; respectively), but only high Steno-Risk remained independently associated with ≥2 plaques (OR 3.31 [1.61-6.80]). Conclusion: Steno-Risk is independently associated with preclinical atherosclerosis. Further studies are needed to ascertain its usefulness in this high-risk population.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.