This systematic review aims to illustrate the published results of "minimally invasive" procedures for correction of hallux valgus. Based on former systematic reviews on that topic, the literature search was organised by two independent investigators. MEDLINE was systematically searched for available studies. The keywords used were "hallux valgus", "bunion", "percutaneous surgery", "minimally invasive surgery", "arthroscopy", "Bosch" and "SERI". Studies were assessed using the level of evidence rating. A total of 21 papers were included in this review. These studies described a total of 1,750 patients with 2,195 instances of percutaneous, minimally invasive or arthroscopic hallux valgus surgery. Clinical reports of results after minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery at meetings are common. Published results in peer-reviewed journals are less common and the majority of papers are level IV studies according to the level of evidence ratings. We found one level II and three level III studies. Reported complications seem to be less than one may see in one's own clinical practice. This possible bias may be related to the fact that most studies are published by centres performing primarily minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery.

Therapeutic, Level IV: Case series.

The use of retrograde intramedullary compression nail results in good rates of limb salvage when used for hindfoot reconstruction in patients with Charcot arthropathy. Cite this article: 2018;100-B:190-6.

Background: The minimally invasive distal metatarsal metaphyseal osteotomy (DMMO) is a percutaneous operative technique with the aim to relieve the symptoms of metatarsalgia. To our knowledge, no previous research has analyzed both pre- and postoperative pedobarographic data including the changes in plantar pressure. Methods: Thirty patients (31 feet) were operated on with a DMMO and included in a prospective study. Clinical, radiologic, and pedobarographic outcomes were evaluated in comparison with the preoperative parameters. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) forefoot score, the Foot Function Index (FFI), the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were used in order to assess clinical parameters. Radiographs were taken to compare metatarsal lengths. The pedobarographic analysis served to determine plantar peak pressure (PPP) beneath the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints. Results: All scores indicated a significant mean pre- to postoperative improvement (AOFAS = 31.9 points, FAOS = 16.3%, FFI = 24.3%, VAS pain = 4.1 points, VAS general limitation = 3.3 points) ( P < .05). PPP was substantially reduced in the relevant area (M6 [plantar area beneath the second and third MTP joint] had a mean pre to post PPP = 14.15 N/cm2) and concurrently higher in the lateral and medial MTP joint areas (M5 mean pre to post = +14.37, M7 pre to post = +7.11). Our mean metatarsal shortening was 6.6 mm. However, our findings do not demonstrate a significant correlation between metatarsal length relationships and the prevalence of metatarsalgia. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate a significant improvement in clinical scores and PPP. A statistically significant relation between metatarsal length and the prevalence of metatarsalgia was not found in this prospective case series Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

No abstract