Purpose: To understand how the social network of patients with acquired brain injury facilitates or hinders resumption of their activities, such as social and leisure activities, and how this affects patients' wellbeing and quality of life. Methods: Thematic analysis was applied to 70 narratives about family members, friends, neighbors and colleagues helping or hindering patients in resuming their activities. The narratives were derived from social workers with extensive experience with brain-injured patients and their social networks. Results: The narratives show that an available, understanding and well-informed network enhances activity resumption by being inclusive and encouraging patients to develop their skills. This is in line with earlier studies based on patients' experiences. Whereas the patient-based studies emphasize that being unsupportive or overprotective hinders patients from resuming their activities, this study also shows that preventing patients from meeting others or placing too-high demands results in activity loss, social isolation and reduced well-being and quality of life. Conclusions: Several social network factors play a role in activity resumption, well-being, and quality of life of after brain injury. Early after the brain injury, rehabilitation professionals should work with patients' family members, friends, and others and educate them about how to provide adequate support. ä IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Since the patient's social network is an important determinant of activity resumption, rehabilitation professionals should analyze its features soon after brain injury, such as whether patients have an understanding network that encourages them and includes them in their activities. Since especially close network members tend to be protective of or place high demands on the patient, rehabilitation professionals should explain to them the importance of activity resumption for the patient's wellbeing and the adverse effects of being overprotective or over-demanding. Rehabilitation professionals should include other network members, such as friends or colleagues, in the rehabilitation process and educate them about how to support patients in resuming their activities.

Purpose This study aims to explore the difference in cognitive strategy use during observed occupational performance between and within different levels of impaired awareness of deficits of individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional study (N = 24) of individuals with ABI receiving rehabilitation and with the capacity to demonstrate goal-directed behaviour (Allen cognitive level screen score = 4.0) was undertaken. Cognitive strategy use during occupational performance of daily activities (measured with the perceive, recall, plan and perform [PRPP]) was evaluated between and within different awareness levels (awareness levels measured by the self-regulation skill interview). Statistical analyses, using independent t-test, Mann Whitney U test, ANOVA and Friedman test, were executed. Findings Significant differences were shown for both strengths and weaknesses in cognitive strategy use between emergent (n = 13) and anticipatory awareness (n = 11) groups on PRPP items “perceive”, “sensing” and “mapping”; and “searches”, “recall steps”, “identify obstacles”, “calibrates”, “stops”, “continues” and “persists”. Within emergent awareness group, participants scored lowest related to “perceive”, “plan”, “sensing”, “mapping”, “programming” and “evaluating”. Within anticipatory awareness group, participants scored lowest related to “plan”, “programming” and “evaluating”. Practical implications This study showed differences in cognitive strategy application during task performance in individuals with emergent or anticipatory awareness deficits that fit with theoretical expectations. It is recommended to make use of the PRPP assessment results (strengths and weaknesses in cognitive strategy application) to support the level of awareness determination. The PRPP assessment results and the level of awareness tailor the clinical reasoning process for personalised intervention planning and cognitive strategy training. Originality/value Because impaired awareness has so much impact on the course and outcome of rehabilitation (Rotenberg-Shpigelman et al., 2014), in clinical practice, it is of paramount importance to be aware of the level of awareness of the client (Smeets et al., 2017) and the effect on occupational performance.