Cell cycle dysregulation is prerequisite for cancer formation. However, it is unknown whether the mode of dysregulation affects disease characteristics. Here, we conduct comprehensive analyses of cell cycle checkpoint dysregulation using patient data and experimental investigations. We find that ATM mutation predisposes the diagnosis of primary estrogen receptor (ER) + /human epidermal growth factor (HER)2 − cancer in older women. Conversely, CHK2 dysregulation induces formation of metastatic, premenopausal ER + /HER2 − breast cancer ( P = 0.001) that is treatment-resistant (HR = 6.15, P = 0.01). Lastly, while mutations in ATR alone are rare, ATR / TP53 co-mutation is 12-fold enriched over expected in ER + /HER2 − disease ( P = 0.002) and associates with metastatic progression (HR = 2.01, P = 0.006). Concordantly, ATR dysregulation induces metastatic phenotypes in TP53 mutant, not wild-type, cells. Overall, we identify mode of cell cycle dysregulation as a distinct event that determines subtype, metastatic potential, and treatment responsiveness, providing rationale for reconsidering diagnostic classification through the lens of the mode of cell cycle dysregulation. .
Cell cycle dysregulation is a prerequisite for cancer formation. However, whether the type of cell cycle dysregulation event a cell incurs during transformation to malignancy influences the type of cancer that evolves or clinical outcome is unknown. In a comprehensive analysis of cell cycle dysregulation in breast cancer patient tumors, we associate mutations in each of four cell cycle checkpoint kinase genes, ATM, CHEK2, ATR and CHEK1, with known tumor characteristics and clinical outcome, and test these associations experimentally using transgenic mice, patient-derived xenografts and breast cancer cell line model systems. Results of this work demonstrate that dysregulation of specific cell cycle checkpoint kinases differently impacts the type of breast cancer that evolves in patients and in experimental model systems, and influences treatment responsiveness and disease progression. For instance, CHEK2 mutations associate preferentially with the incidence of metastatic, premenopausal estrogen receptor (ER)+/HER2- breast cancer in patient data (p=0.001) that is resistant to standard frontline therapy (HR=6.15, p=0.01). These associations appear causal when tested in an immune-competent genetically-engineered mouse model of Chk2 loss, in patient-derived xenograft, and in cell line experiments. On the other hand, ATR mutation by itself is not frequent in ER+/HER2- breast cancer, but co-incident mutation of ATR and TP53 is 2-fold enriched (p=0.002) and associates with metastatic progression (HR=2.01, p=0.007). Concordantly, ATR dysregulation induces metastatic phenotypes in ER+/HER- TP53 mutant, but not in TP53 wildtype, cell lines. Together, these results systematize the impact of individual cell cycle checkpoint kinases on the evolution of cancer subtypes, and on disease progression. Statement of Significance These findings reframe the paradigm of breast cancer classification through the lens of early cell cycle dysregulation events by demonstrating that cell cycle decisions during malignant transformation can direct the type of breast cancer that evolves, how it will respond to treatment, and whether it will metastasize. This work provides rationale for streamlined testing of checkpoint kinase dysregulation to improve precision diagnostics for cancer patients. Citation Format: Sinem Seker, Elena Oropeza, Sabrina Carrel, Aloran Mazumder, Nindo Punturi, Jonathan Lei, Meenakshi Anurag, Bora Lim, Matthew Bainbridge, Svasti Haricharan. Cell cycle dysregulation in breast cancer: why the details matter [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-02.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.