Background Although recent studies have indicated that imbalance in the respiratory microbiome composition is linked to several chronic respiratory diseases, the association between the lung microbiome and lung cancer has not been extensively studied. Conflicting reports of individual studies on respiratory microbiome alterations in lung cancer complicate the matter for specifying how the lung microbiome is linked to lung cancer. Consequently, as the first meta-analysis on this topic, we integrate publicly available 16S rRNA gene sequence data on lung tissue samples of lung cancer patients to identify bacterial taxa which differ consistently between case and control groups. Results The findings of the current study suggest that the relative abundance of several bacterial taxa including Actinobacteria phylum, Corynebacteriaceae and Halomonadaceae families, and Corynebacterium, Lachnoanaerobaculum, and Halomonas genera is significantly decreased (p < 0.05) in lung tumor tissues of lung cancer patients in comparison with tumor-adjacent normal tissues. Conclusions Despite the underlying need for scrutinizing the findings further, the present study lays the groundwork for future research and adds to our limited understanding of the key role of the lung microbiome and its complex interaction with lung cancer. More data on demographic factors and tumor tissue types would help establish a greater degree of accuracy in characterizing the lung microbial community which accords with subtypes and stages of the disease and fully capturing the changes of the lung microbiome in lung cancer.
Background It has been demonstrated in the literature that a dysbiotic microbiome could have a negative impact on the host immune system and promote disease onset or exacerbation. Co-occurrence networks have been widely adopted to identify biomarkers and keystone taxa in the pathogenesis of microbiome-related diseases. Despite the promising results that network-driven approaches have led to in various human diseases, there is a dearth of research pertaining to key taxa that contribute to the pathogenesis of lung cancer. Therefore, our primary goal in this study is to explore co-existing relationships among members of the lung microbial community and any potential gained or lost interactions in lung cancer. Results Using integrative and network-based approaches, we integrated four studies assessing the microbiome of lung biopsies of cancer patients. Differential abundance analyses showed that several bacterial taxa are different between tumor and tumor-adjacent normal tissues (FDR adjusted p-value < 0.05). Four, fifteen, and twelve significantly different associations were found at phylum, family, and genus levels. Diversity analyses suggested reduced alpha diversity in the tumor microbiome. However, beta diversity analysis did not show any discernible pattern between groups. In addition, four distinct modules of bacterial families were detected by the DBSCAN clustering method. Finally, in the co-occurrence network context, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Chloroflexi at the phylum level and Bifidobacterium, Massilia, Sphingobacterium, and Ochrobactrum at the genus level showed the highest degree of rewiring. Conclusions Despite the absence of statistically significant differences in the relative abundance of certain taxa between groups, it is imperative not to overlook them for further exploration. This is because they may hold pivotal central roles in the broader network of bacterial taxa (e.g., Bifidobacterium and Massilia). These findings emphasize the importance of a network analysis approach for studying the lung microbiome since it could facilitate identifying key microbial taxa in lung cancer pathogenesis. Relying exclusively on differentially abundant taxa may not be enough to fully grasp the complex interplay between lung cancer and the microbiome. Therefore, a network-based approach can offer deeper insights and a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.