Pain relief of two different oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) in severe primary dysmenorrhoea (PD) was compared. Sixty-six nulliparous patients with severe PD requiring contraception were evaluated. Group 1 comprised 33 healthy controls. Patients with severe PD were divided into two groups. Patients in Group 2 were administered oestradiol valerate/dienogest and patients in Group 3 were administered ethinylestradiol/drospirenone. Doppler indices of both uterine arteries (left and right) including systolic/diastolicrates (S/D), pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) were measured, and a visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied to patients before treatment. VAS scores and Doppler indices were repeated after 3 months of OCP treatment and the changes in values were compared. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were similar. The mean value of RI was significantly lower after therapy in Groups 2 and 3 in the right and left uterine arteries (p = .001 and p = .039, respectively). The clinical trial number was NCT03124524. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject: OCPs are the most appropriate treatment option for PD. There is no clear data about OCP containing dienogest for treatment in PD. Dienogest has been reported to be highly effective in the treatment of endometriosis and is also recommended as first-line therapy for pelvic pain-associated endometriosis. What the results of this study add: In this study, although there was no superiority in pain relief between the treatment groups, lower VAS scores and lower RI values of uterine arteries were seen after treatment. Both OCPs relieve pain in severe PD. There was no serious adverse effect in the patients. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: Estradiol valerate/dienogest, which is a routinely prescribed drug for heavy menstrual bleeding in women who desire oral contraception, is as effective as ethinylestradiol/drospirenone in pain relief.

UEMs associated with other malformations are usually a sign of underlying severe chromosomal abnormalities, and the prognosis is poor. In contrast, chromosomal structure in isolated cases is normal, and the perinatal and postnatal outcomes are good. In general, US is an effective tool in differentiating fetuses with isolated UEM from those with UEM associated with additional malformations. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 45:267-276, 2017.

Impaired 50-g glucose test in pregnancy is related not only to increased maternal body mass index but also to fetal fat distribution. Although fetal abdominal circumference measurement and estimated fetal weight were not different between study and control group, increased anterior abdominal wall thickness can be detected in impaired 50-g OGCT group.

No abstract

OBJECTIVE:To examine the interobserver variability for fetal biometric parameters and to focus on how this variability affects the combined first-trimester screening test results.METHODS:Sixty-four singleton pregnancies who were scheduled for combined first-trimester screening were investigated. Two experienced sonographers performed all examinations at the same visit. The risk calculations of screening were performed according to the each operator’s individual ultrasonographic fetal measurements. Interobserver variability in measurements of fetal nuchal translucency (NT) and crown-rump length (CRL) and the effect of this interobserver variability on the screening results were assessed.RESULTS:Interobserver reliabilities for NT and CRL were 0.687 and 0.945 (p<0.001), respectively. Interobserver reliability coefficients for trisomy 21 and trisomy 13/18 were 0.945 and 0.963 (p<0.001), respectively.CONCLUSION:Our study demonstrated quite high interobserver reliability for CRL measurement, while interobserver agreement for NT was lower. Despite this lower reliability and agreement for NT measurement, interobserver reliability for chromosomal abnormalities was quite high.