No abstract

The breeding goal in dairy cattle is to increase lifetime profit per animal. Profit is a function of production and the time that a cow remains in herd. Thus, profit can only be recorded when a cow is culled, and breeding value of more profitable aniUnauthenticated Download Date | 5/13/18 1:11 AM

The aim of this study was to compare genetic (co)variance components and prediction accuracies of breeding values from genomic random regression models (gRRM) and pedigree-based random regression models (pRRM), both defined with or without an additional environmental gradient. The used gradient was a temperaturehumidity index (THI), considered in statistical models to investigate possible genotype by environment (G×E) interactions. Data included 106,505 test-day records for milk yield (MY) and 106,274 test-day records for somatic cell score (SCS) from 12,331 genotyped Holstein Friesian daughters of 522 genotyped sires. After single nucleotide polymorphism quality control, all genotyped animals had 40,468 single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Test-day traits from recording years 2010 to 2015 were merged with temperature and humidity data from the nearest weather station. In this regard, 58 large-scale farms from the German federal states of Berlin-Brandenburg and Mecklenburg-West Pomerania were allocated to 31 weather stations. For models with a THI gradient, additive genetic variances and heritabilities for MY showed larger fluctuations in dependency of DIM and THI than for SCS. For both traits, heritabilities were smaller from the gRRM compared with estimates from the pRRM. Milk yield showed considerably larger G×E interactions than SCS. In genomic models including a THI gradient, genetic correlations between different DIM × THI combinations ranged from 0.26 to 0.94 for MY. For SCS, the lowest genetic correlation was 0.78, estimated between SCS from the last DIM class and the highest THI class. In addition, for THI × THI combinations, genetic correlations were smaller for MY compared with SCS. A 5-fold cross-validation was used to assess prediction accuracies from 4 different models. The 4 different models were gRRM and pRRM, both modeled with or without G×E interactions. Prediction accuracy was the correlation between breeding values for the prediction data set (i.e., excluding the phenotypic records from this data set) with respective breeding values considering all phenotypic information. Prediction accuracies for sires and for their daughters were largest for the gRRM considering G×E interactions. Such modeling with 2 covariates, DIM and THI, also allowed accurate predictions of genetic values at specific DIM. In comparison with a pRRM, the effect of a gRRM with G×E interactions on gain in prediction accuracies was stronger for daughters than for sires. In conclusion, we found stronger effect of THI alterations on genetic parameter estimates for MY than for SCS. Hence, gRRM considering THI especially contributed to gain in prediction accuracies for MY.

1. A study was conducted to study direct dominance genetic and maternal effects on genetic evaluation of production traits in dual-purpose chickens. The data set consisted of records of body weight and egg production of 49 749 Mazandaran fowls from 19 consecutive generations. Based on combinations of different random effects, including direct additive and dominance genetic and maternal additive genetic and environmental effects, 8 different models were compared. 2. Inclusion of a maternal genetic effect in the models noticeably improved goodness of fit for all traits. Direct dominance genetic effect did not have noticeable effects on goodness of fit but simultaneous inclusion of both direct dominance and maternal additive genetic effects improved fitting criteria and accuracies of genetic parameter estimates for hatching body weight and egg production traits. 3. Estimates of heritability (h) for body weights at hatch, 8 weeks and 12 weeks of age (BW0, BW8 and BW12, respectively), age at sexual maturity (ASM), average egg weights at 28-32 weeks of laying period (AEW), egg number (EN) and egg production intensity (EI) were 0.08, 0.21, 0.22, 0.22, 0.21, 0.09 and 0.10, respectively. For BW0, BW8, BW12, ASM, AEW, EN and EI, proportion of dominance genetic to total phenotypic variance (d) were 0.06, 0.08, 0.01, 0.06, 0.06, 0.08 and 0.07 and maternal heritability estimates (m) were 0.05, 0.04, 0.03, 0.13, 0.21, 0.07 and 0.03, respectively. Negligible coefficients of maternal environmental effect (c) from 0.01 to 0.08 were estimated for all traits, other than BW0, which had an estimate of 0.30. 4. Breeding values (BVs) estimated for body weights at early ages (BW0 and BW8) were considerably affected by components of the models, but almost similar BVs were estimated by different models for higher age body weight (BW12) and egg production traits (ASM, AEW, EN and EI). Generally, it could be concluded that inclusion of maternal effects (both genetic and environmental) and, to a lesser extent, direct dominance genetic effect would improve the accuracy of genetic evaluation for early age body weights in dual-purpose chickens.

No abstract