Introduction : Arboviruses and malaria are both mosquito-borne diseases, with overlapping symptoms and geographic distribution in tropical settings. However, little information is available on the co-occurrence of arboviruses and malaria in areas highly endemic for malaria in Africa. This study was conducted with the aim to determine the frequency of recent Dengue (DENV), Chikungunya (CHIKV) and Zika (ZIKV) infections and their co-occurrence with malaria in six highly endemic districts for malaria in Mozambique.  Methods: Blood samples were collected from febrile outpatients between January 2017 and December 2018 and were then tested for Malaria using RDT. Serum samples from these patients were also tested using commercially available ELISA for the presence of IgM antibodies against CHIKV, ZIKV and DENV, as well as NS1 antigen for DENV. Concurrently, a questionnaire was administered to collect socio-demographic characteristics of patients. Results: Of the 906 participants enrolled, IgM antibodies against CHIKV, DENV and ZIKV were identified in 134 (14.8%), 64 (7.4%) and 83 (9.2%) individuals, respectively. Malaria was diagnosed in 56 (6.2%) participants, of which 16 (28.6%) were also positive for IgM anti CHIKV, 1 (1.8%) for DENV-NS1, 3 (5.4%) for IgM anti-DENV and 10 (17.8%) for IgM anti-ZIKV. There was a trend towards an increase in the frequency of IgM anti CHIKV positive samples, from 7.0% in 2014 to 14.8% in 2018 and IgM anti-ZIKV positive samples increased from 4.9% in 2015 to 9.2% in 2018. Conclusion : This study showed an increased frequency of arbovirus in Mozambique thus far, as well as a frequent occurrence of arbovirus among malaria positive patients. This highlighted the urgency for the establishment of sentinel surveillance sites for arboviruses and the need for an integrated management of febrile illnesses in places where arboviruses and malaria are both prevalent.

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, uncoordinated national responses have been observed around the world which have contributed to the difficulties in controlling the spread of the virus. This lack of dialogue between nations reflects several key determinants including the lack of platforms for non-English speaking researchers and healthcare professionals to engage with critical matters in their native languages. Here, we demonstrate how setting up a dedicated forum for Portuguese-speaking professionals from Brazil, Mozambique and Portugal facilitated the comparison of testing strategies undertaken by those countries during 2020. This working group was established in response to an open workshop conducted in Portuguese in March 2020, in which renowned scientists from lusophone countries were invited to share the COVID-19 responses in their respective countries. To date, the group has convened to address actions, in turn identifying the opportunity to publish the different established approaches to testing strategies undertaken by their countries. This effort highlighted that the governments of those three countries took very different approaches, from case definition to type of test most commonly deployed. This piece emphasizes the need for international bodies to acknowledge the importance of creating forums which are more inclusive to non-speaking English professionals who are at the frontline of healthcare response in challenging settings such as low- and middle-income countries. Finally, fostering approaches like this could represent an efficient strategy to facilitate dialogue, building the necessary steps for a more coordinated response to future global threats.