Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic disease. There are limited data on predictors of good preventive behaviors among healthcare workers. This study aimed to evaluate if any factors were predictors of good preventive behaviors in healthcare workers under the theory of health behavior model. Methods This was a cross-sectional study in healthcare workers who were willing to participate in the study. Participants were requested to fill out a self-administered questionnaire that comprised health behavior model and preventive behaviors from COVID-19 infection. Factors associated with preventive behavior, an outcome, were analyzed by multivariate linear regression analysis. Results There were 273 healthcare workers who participated in this study. The average (SD) age and working duration of participants was 38.9 (12.1) and 11.4 (9.8) years. The preventive behavior category had an average score of 87.6% (70.3/80). After adjusted, knowledge and perception of personal preventability were independently associated with preventive behaviors. The adjusted coefficients of both factors were—0.911 (p 0.009) and 0.477 (p < 0.001). Conclusions Specific knowledge and perception of personal ability questions were associated with preventive behaviors for COVID-19 infection. To improve personal preventive behaviors in healthcare workers, these factors should be emphasized.

Background: Targeting perinatal depressive symptoms among women can reduce premature mortality. However, public health professionals (PHPs) in primary healthcare settings often have low self-efficacy for detection and management of perinatal depressive symptoms among women. This mixed-methods study was aimed at developing and evaluating a self-efficacy improvement programme (SIP) intended to increase PHPs' self-efficacy in efforts to detect and manage perinatal depressive symptoms. Methods: The SIP consisted of 1 day of theory and 4 weeks of practice. Sixty-six PHPs from sub-district health promotion hospitals (primary health care level) in Sakonnakhon, a northeastern province in Thailand, were randomised into an intervention group (n = 33) and a control group (n = 33). Twenty-three of the intervention group participants also took part in focus group discussions (FGDs). Multiple linear regression and qualitative content analysis were used to analyse the data. Results: After the SIP, the intervention group participants had higher self-efficacy score than those in the control group (p = 0.004). The FGDs resulted in four categories emerging: Having confidence, Changing knowledge and attitudes, Increasing perception of an important role, and Increasing awareness of performed function. Conclusions: To enhance the ability of PHPs to detect and manage perinatal depressive symptoms, an intervention programme based on self-efficacy modification is recommended.

No abstract

Background: FRMD3 polymorphisms has suggested that they could be an alternative test to differentiate diabetic nephropathy (DN) from nondiabetic renal disease (NDRD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. This study was performed to investigate the relationship between the FRMD3 gene and clinical characteristics of DN. Methods: Patients who already had renal pathologic results were tested for FRMD3 polymorphisms. The subjects were classified into three groups; DN with diabetic retinopathy (DR), DN without DR, and DM with NDRD. FRMD3 polymorphisms were analyzed in each group. Results: The prevalence of GG, CG, and CC was 44.4%, 42.2%, and 13.3% respectively. There was no significant difference in clinical parameters, which consisted of disease duration, proteinuria, and complications in DN with or without DR and DM with NDRD. The G allele was mainly found in DN with DR patients (50.8%) whereas the C allele was found in DM with NDRD patients (43.5%) (p = 0.02). There was a significant association between the CC genotype in NDRD when compared to GG (p = 0.001). In addition, the C allele was 2.10-fold more often associated with NDRD than the G allele (p = 0.03). The CC genotype was correlated with risk for NDRD than the GG and GC genotypes, with odds ratios of 6.89 and 4.91, respectively (p = 0.02). Conclusion: C allele presentation, especially homozygous CC, was associated with NDRD pathology in patients with overt proteinuria. Hence, kidney biopsy is suggested in those with the C allele or homozygous CC genotype, regardless of retinopathy manifestations.