The overarching aim of this study is to use core measurements of porosity and permeability in three wells (MO1, MO2, and MO3) to generate a scheme of sandstone reservoir zonation for identification of flow units in the E-M gas field of the Western Bredasdorp Basin Offshore in South Africa. The evaluation method began by establishing rock types within a geological framework that allowed the definition of five facies, grouped as facies A, B, C, D, and E. Facies A was recognized as the best petrophysical rock type. In contrast, facies E was recognized as impervious rock. The results of independent reservoir classification methods were integrated to identify flow zones that yielded positive results. The results ultimately culminated in a zonation scheme for the Basin. Twelve flow zones were identified and were broadly classified as high, moderate, low, very low, and tight zones. The high zone was characterized by pore throat radius of ‡ 10 lm, flow zone index (FZI) of ‡ 5.0 lm, and flow unit efficiency (FUE) of ‡ 0.8. In contrast, very low efficiency zones had pore throat radius and FZI of < 2 lm, and FUE of £ 0.2. The high-efficiency zones were comparable to facies A and the tight zone to facies E. Facie C provided sand-sand contacts that allowed flow between the zones. One high, two moderate, four low, and five very low efficiency zones were identified. The plot of FUE can be compared directly with flowmeter logs. The results obtained from this study will serve as an input parameter for reservoir studies in the western Bredasdorp Basin.
This study aims to generate rock units based on core permeability and porosity of OW oilfield in the Bredasdorp Basin offshore South Africa. In this study, we identified and classified lithofacies based on sedimentology reports in conjunction with well logs. Lucia's petrophysical classification method is used to classify rocks into three classes. Results revealed three lithofacies as A (sandstone, coarse to medium-grained), B (fine to medium-grained sandstone), and C (carbonaceous claystone, finely laminated with siltstone). Lithofacies A is the best reservoir quality and corresponds to class 1, while lithofacies B and C correspond to class 2 and 3, which are good and poor reservoir quality rock, respectively. An integrated reservoir zonation for the rocks is based on four different zonation methods (Flow Zone indicator (FZI), Winland r35, Hydraulic conductivity (HC), and Stratigraphy modified Lorenz plot (SMLP)). Four flow zones Reservoir rock types (RRTs) were identified as RRT1, RRT3, RRT4, and RRT5, respectively. The RRT5 is the best reservoir quality composed of a megaporous rock unit, with an average FZI value between 5 and 10 µm, and HC from 40 to 120 mD/v3, ranked as very good. The most prolific flow units (RRT5 and RRT4 zones) form more than 75% of each well's flow capacities are supplied by two flow units (FU1 and FU3). The RRT1 is the most reduced rock quality composed of impervious and nanoporous rock. Quartz is the dominant framework grain, and siderite is the dominant cement that affects flow zones. This study has demonstrated a robust approach to delineate flow units in the OW oilfield. We have developed a useful regional petrophysical reservoir rock flow zonation model for clastic reservoir sediments. This study has produced, for the first time, insights into the petrophysical properties of the OW oilfield from the Bredasdorp Basin South Africa, based on integration of core and mineralogy data. A novel sandstone reservoir zonation classification criteria developed from this study can be applied to other datasets of sandstone reservoirs with confidence.
The presence of heavy metals in plants from oil sand deposits may reflect mineralization resulting from petroleum biodegradation. Petroleum composition and heavy metal analyses were performed using thermal desorption gas chromatography and atomic absorption spectrophotometry on oil sand and plant root samples from the same localities in the Dahomey Basin. The results from the oil sand showed mainly heavy-end hydrocarbon components, humps of unresolved complex mixtures (UCM), absences of C6-C12 hydrocarbon chains, pristane, and phytane, indicating severe biodegradation. In addition, they showed varying concentrations of vanadium (2.699–7.708 ppm), nickel (4.005–11.716 ppm), chromium (1.686–5.733 ppm), cobalt (0.953–3.223 ppm), lead (0.649–0.978 ppm), and cadmium (0.188–0.461 ppm). Furthermore, these heavy metals were present in Citrus, Theobroma Cacao, Elaeis guineensis, and Cola. The chromium, nickel, vanadium, lead, cobalt, and cadmium concentrations in the Citrus were 7.475, 4.981, 0.551, 0.001, 0.806, and 0.177 ppm, respectively. For the Theobroma Cacao, the concentrations of chromium, nickel, vanadium, lead, cobalt, and cadmium were 7.095, 16.697, 2.151, 0.023, 3.942, and 0.254 ppm. Elaeis guineensis also showed the presence of chromium (32.685 ppm), nickel (32.423 ppm), vanadium (11.983 ppm), lead (0.190 ppm), cobalt (4.425 ppm), and cadmium (0.262 ppm). The amounts of chromium, nickel, vanadium, lead, cobalt, and cadmium in the Cola were 9.687, 9.157, 0.779, 0.037, 0.695, and 0.023 ppm. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) safe and permissible limits for Cd (0.003 ppm), Cr (0.1 ppm), Ni (0.05 ppm), and Pb (0.1 ppm) in agricultural soils were all exceeded in the oil sand. The presence of these metals in the oil sands and their uptake by the plants could potentially be toxic, resulting in high mortality. The metal–metal correlation of the plant’s rootsto the oil sand indicates the nonanthropogenic origin of the heavy metals, which leads to the conclusion that their source is related to the hydrocarbon accumulation in the Afowo sand.
The present study is focused on the comparison of petrophysical rock typing and zonation methods of the Valanginian age sandstone in the Pletmos Basin offshore South Africa, to produce a zonation scheme for the low-permeability shaly sandstone reservoirs from core porosity and permeability data. The Valanginian age sediments of the Lower Cretaceous consist predominantly of a shallow marine sequence with interbeds of siltstone, claystone, generally fine-grained sandstone, and glauconitic, with varying amounts of an argillaceous matrix. A core description report was used in conjunction with a gamma-ray log to group rock types into different facies based on texture and grain size. Three different facies were identified as facies 1, a moderately sorted fine to medium-grained glauconitic sandstone; facies 2, a fine to very fine-grained glauconitic sandstone, moderately sorted; facies 3, a very fine sandstone to siltstone, laminated, argillaceous and bioturbated. Three independent reservoir zonation methods (Winland r35 pore throat, Hydraulic Flow Unit, and Stratigraphic Modified Lorenz Plot) were applied to three wells (SW1, SW2, and SW3) for which wireline logs, core porosity, and permeability data are available. Results were analyzed and compared with facies used as a context for the identification of rock types and zones. The results revealed eleven zones, grouped as moderate, very-low, and tight zones. The moderate flow zone is the best reservoir quality rock composed of macroporous rock type, ranked, as good rock type associated with facies 1. Three very-low flow zones were identified, which are of a microporous rock type, ranked as poor quality rock, associated with facies 2. Eight tight zones were revealed, which are of nanoporous rock type ranked as an impervious rock. The tight flow zone is the most reduced rock quality associated with facies 3. This study has developed a zonation scheme that will be used to locate other flow zones as well as to investigate whether the units/zones identified extend to other parts of the field.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.